On 7/3/22 09:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
device_get_match_data() in ACPI case calls similar to acpi_match_device(). Hence there is no need to duplicate the call. Just assign what is in the id->driver_data.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c index 26df780c702e..346813aa3768 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c +++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/bdw.c @@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ static int sof_broadwell_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) id = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, dev); if (!id) return -ENODEV;
desc = (const struct sof_dev_desc *)id->driver_data;
ret = snd_intel_acpi_dsp_driver_probe(dev, id->id); if (ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_ANY && ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_SOF) {
@@ -681,11 +682,7 @@ static int sof_broadwell_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENODEV; }
- desc = device_get_match_data(dev);
- if (!desc)
return -ENODEV;- return sof_acpi_probe(pdev, device_get_match_data(dev));
- return sof_acpi_probe(pdev, desc);
Thanks Andy, we have the same code pattern in sound/soc/sof/intel/byt.c, can we change it as part of the series to keep the two files aligned?
}
/* acpi_driver definition */