On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:18 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com wrote:
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile b/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c69237971da5 --- /dev/null +++ b/sound/soc/sof/imx/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
+ccflags-y += -DDEBUG
this should be removed or in a separate patch.
All right.
+struct imx8_priv {
struct device *dev;struct snd_sof_dev *sdev;struct imx_dsp_ipc *dsp_ipc;struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc;maybe a comment to explain what 'sc' stands for?
Sure.
+};
+static void imx8_get_windows(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) +{
struct sof_ipc_window_elem *elem;u32 outbox_offset = 0;u32 stream_offset = 0;u32 inbox_offset = 0;u32 outbox_size = 0;u32 stream_size = 0;u32 inbox_size = 0;int i;if (!sdev->info_window) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: have no window info\n");return;}for (i = 0; i < sdev->info_window->num_windows; i++) {elem = &sdev->info_window->window[i];switch (elem->type) {case SOF_IPC_REGION_UPBOX:inbox_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET;inbox_size = elem->size;snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ inbox_offset,elem->size, "inbox",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_DOWNBOX:outbox_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET;outbox_size = elem->size;snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ outbox_offset,elem->size, "outbox",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_TRACE:snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET,elem->size, "etrace",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_DEBUG:snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET,elem->size, "debug",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_STREAM:stream_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET;stream_size = elem->size;snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ stream_offset,elem->size, "stream",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_REGS:snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET,elem->size, "regs",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;case SOF_IPC_REGION_EXCEPTION:sdev->dsp_oops_offset = elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET;snd_sof_debugfs_io_item(sdev,sdev->bar[SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM]+ elem->offset + MBOX_OFFSET,elem->size, "exception",SOF_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_D0_ONLY);break;default:dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: get illegal window info\n");return;}}if (outbox_size == 0 || inbox_size == 0) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: get illegal mailbox window\n");return;}snd_sof_dsp_mailbox_init(sdev, inbox_offset, inbox_size,outbox_offset, outbox_size);sdev->stream_box.offset = stream_offset;sdev->stream_box.size = stream_size;dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " mailbox upstream 0x%x - size 0x%x\n",inbox_offset, inbox_size);dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " mailbox downstream 0x%x - size 0x%x\n",outbox_offset, outbox_size);dev_dbg(sdev->dev, " stream region 0x%x - size 0x%x\n",stream_offset, stream_size);+}
This looks 100% similar to Baytrail?
Yes!
+/*
- IPC Firmware ready.
- */
+static int imx8_fw_ready(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 msg_id) +{
struct sof_ipc_fw_ready *fw_ready = &sdev->fw_ready;u32 offset;int ret;/* mailbox must be on 4k boundary */offset = MBOX_OFFSET;dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "ipc: DSP is ready 0x%8.8x offset 0x%x\n",msg_id, offset);/* no need to re-check version/ABI for subsequent boots */if (!sdev->first_boot)return 0;/* copy data from the DSP FW ready offset */sof_block_read(sdev, sdev->mailbox_bar, offset, fw_ready,sizeof(*fw_ready));snd_sof_dsp_mailbox_init(sdev, fw_ready->dspbox_offset,fw_ready->dspbox_size,fw_ready->hostbox_offset,fw_ready->hostbox_size);/* make sure ABI version is compatible */ret = snd_sof_ipc_valid(sdev);if (ret < 0)return ret;/* now check for extended data */snd_sof_fw_parse_ext_data(sdev, SOF_FW_BLK_TYPE_SRAM, MBOX_OFFSET +sizeof(struct sof_ipc_fw_ready));imx8_get_windows(sdev);return 0;+}
That code looks nearly similar to the baytrail one except for the last line, we should look into factoring this.
Yes, I got most of my inspiration from intel code.
+static void imx8_get_reply(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) +{
struct snd_sof_ipc_msg *msg = sdev->msg;struct sof_ipc_reply reply;unsigned long flags;int ret = 0;if (!msg) {dev_warn(sdev->dev, "unexpected ipc interrupt\n");return;}/* get reply */sof_mailbox_read(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset, &reply, sizeof(reply));spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags);if (reply.error < 0) {memcpy(msg->reply_data, &reply, sizeof(reply));ret = reply.error;} else {/* reply has correct size? */if (reply.hdr.size != msg->reply_size) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "error: reply expected %zu got %u bytes\n",msg->reply_size, reply.hdr.size);ret = -EINVAL;}/* read the message */if (msg->reply_size > 0)sof_mailbox_read(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset,msg->reply_data, msg->reply_size);}msg->reply_error = ret;spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags);I don't see a spin_lock/unlock for the get_reply in the Intel code, is this necessary?
Hmm, you are right. I think I've used an older version of the intel code where there a lock.
+}
+void imx_dsp_handle_reply(struct imx_dsp_ipc *ipc) +{
struct imx8_priv *priv = imx_dsp_get_data(ipc);imx8_get_reply(priv->sdev);snd_sof_ipc_reply(priv->sdev, 0);+}
+void imx_dsp_handle_request(struct imx_dsp_ipc *ipc) +{
struct imx8_priv *priv = imx_dsp_get_data(ipc);snd_sof_ipc_msgs_rx(priv->sdev);+}
+struct imx_dsp_ops dsp_ops = {
.handle_reply = imx_dsp_handle_reply,.handle_request = imx_dsp_handle_request,+};
+static int imx8_send_msg(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_ipc_msg *msg) +{
struct imx8_priv *priv = (struct imx8_priv *)sdev->private;sof_mailbox_write(sdev, sdev->host_box.offset, msg->msg_data,msg->msg_size);imx_dsp_ring_doorbell(priv->dsp_ipc, 0);return 0;+}
+/*
- DSP control.
- */
+static int imx8_run(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) +{
int ret;struct imx8_priv *dsp_priv = (struct imx8_priv *)sdev->private;ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP,IMX_SC_C_OFS_SEL, 1);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset source select\n");return ret;}ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP,IMX_SC_C_OFS_AUDIO, 0x80);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of AUDIO\n");return ret;}ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP,IMX_SC_C_OFS_PERIPH, 0x5A);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of PERIPH %d\n",ret);return ret;}ret = imx_sc_misc_set_control(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP,IMX_SC_C_OFS_IRQ, 0x51);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Error system address offset of IRQ\n");return ret;}imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(dsp_priv->sc_ipc, IMX_SC_R_DSP, true,RESET_VECTOR_VADDR);return 0;+}
+static int imx8_probe(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev) +{
struct imx8_priv *priv;int i;struct platform_device *pdev =container_of(sdev->dev, struct platform_device, dev);struct platform_device *ipc_dev;struct resource *mmio;int num_domains = 0;u32 base, size;int ret = 0;struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;struct device_node *res_node;struct resource res;nit-pick: can we reorder so that we have all counters last and a nice xmas-tree shape.
Ack.
priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);if (!priv)return -ENOMEM;sdev->private = priv;priv->dev = sdev->dev;priv->sdev = sdev;ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->sc_ipc);if (ret) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Cannot obtain SCU handle (err = %d)\n",ret);return ret;}ipc_dev = platform_device_register_data(sdev->dev, "imx-dsp",PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,pdev, sizeof(*pdev));if (IS_ERR(ipc_dev)) {dev_err(sdev->dev, "Failed to register platform device\n");return PTR_ERR(ipc_dev);}priv->dsp_ipc = dev_get_drvdata(&ipc_dev->dev);if (!priv->dsp_ipc)return -EPROBE_DEFER;imx_dsp_set_data(priv->dsp_ipc, priv);priv->dsp_ipc->ops = &dsp_ops;num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains","#power-domain-cells");for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) {struct device *pd_dev;struct device_link *link;pd_dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(&pdev->dev, i);if (IS_ERR(pd_dev))return PTR_ERR(pd_dev);link = device_link_add(&pdev->dev, pd_dev,DL_FLAG_STATELESS |DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);if (IS_ERR(link))return PTR_ERR(link);Question: is the error flow final? Wondering if we release all the resources/memory/devices on errors?
Will check again. It seemed no need for resource freeing.
Also are all the resources device-managed, I don't see a remove()?
Good catch for pm stuff. We mostly didn't care about remove because drivers are always Y in our distribution.
Thanks Pierre for review, I will let some time for others to have a look and send a new version.
thanks, Daniel.