-----Original Message----- From: sound-open-firmware-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:sound-open- firmware-bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 6:17 PM To: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com; Keyon Jie yang.jie@linux.intel.com; sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [Sound-open-firmware] about multiple BE dai_links support
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 10:48 -0700, Ranjani Sridharan wrote:
Thanks for the correction, will send patch with this once everyone aligned to use this solution.
Keyon I've been thinking about this a little bit more and I have a couple of questions:
- What will the ID be? Could it be the same as the port number?
Yes, it could be same, and could be different also.
- Pierre brought this up in another email, will the ID's be
sequential across different DAI types? Or will they start at 0?
In my opinion, it is more important that this ID should be unique, usually we will make them sequential and start at 0, but theoretically, it is not mandatory, nothing can prevent you using ids like 1, 3, 5, 6, 8,...
Shouldn't ID be the BE DAI link ID ?
Yep.
Thanks, ~Keyon
Liam _______________________________________________ Sound-open-firmware mailing list Sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/sound-open-firmware