On 27.05.2018 09:30, Ranjani Sridharan wrote:
Add support for adding DMIC config for DMIC DAI type.
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com
topology/test/test-capture.m4 | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/topology/test/test-capture.m4 b/topology/test/test-capture.m4 index a1f283f..56fda8f 100644 --- a/topology/test/test-capture.m4 +++ b/topology/test/test-capture.m4 @@ -69,10 +69,20 @@ PCM_CAPTURE_ADD(Passthrough, 3, 0, 0, PIPELINE_PCM_2) # TEST_SSP_DATA_BITS bit I2S using TEST_SSP_PHY_BITS bit sample conatiner on SSP TEST_DAI_PORT # DAI_CONFIG(TEST_DAI_TYPE, TEST_DAI_PORT, TEST_DAI_LINK_NAME,
SSP_CONFIG(TEST_SSP_MODE,DAI_CLOCK(mclk, TEST_SSP_MCLK, codec_mclk_in),DAI_CLOCK(bclk, TEST_SSP_BCLK, codec_slave),DAI_CLOCK(fsync, 48000, codec_slave),DAI_TDM(2, TEST_SSP_PHY_BITS, 3, 3),SSP_SAMPLE_BITS(TEST_DAI_TYPE, TEST_DAI_PORT,TEST_SSP_DATA_BITS)))
ifelse(TEST_DAI_TYPE, `SSP',SSP_CONFIG(TEST_SSP_MODE,DAI_CLOCK(mclk, TEST_SSP_MCLK, codec_mclk_in),DAI_CLOCK(bclk, TEST_SSP_BCLK, codec_slave),DAI_CLOCK(fsync, 48000, codec_slave),DAI_TDM(2, TEST_SSP_PHY_BITS, 3, 3),SSP_SAMPLE_BITS(TEST_DAI_TYPE, TEST_DAI_PORT,TEST_SSP_DATA_BITS)),TEST_DAI_TYPE, `DMIC',DMIC_CONFIG(TEST_DMIC_DRIVER_VERSION,TEST_DMIC_CLK_MIN,TEST_DMIC_CLK_MAX, TEST_DMIC_DUTY_MIN,TEST_DMIC_DUTY_MAX, TEST_PDM_ACTIVE,TEST_DMIC_SAMPLE_RATE, DMIC_WORD_LENGTH(TEST_DAI_FORMAT),TEST_DAI_TYPE, TEST_DAI_PORT,PDM_CONFIG(TEST_DAI_TYPE, TEST_DAI_PORT,LIST(`', PDM_TUPLES(0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)))),
When there's need to make a 4ch capture topology would TEST_PDM_ACTIVE be set to 2 and the PDM_TUPLES macro arguments be duplicated with another 0110000 (where the "1" values are mic enables)? Or is this function OK as such to use with any value of TEST_PDM_ACTIVE within HW capability limits and as long as both microphones of a stereo PDM controller are used?
Creating a mono single microphone capture topology obviously needs a new test test-capture.m4 macro version.
Thanks, Seppo
`'))