20 Jun
2018
20 Jun
'18
12:22 p.m.
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 09:32 +0800, zhigangw wrote:
Best to use component ID here. Btw if this is high frequency then it should also be made verbose trace.
Liam
I also think about it. Component ID is not convenient for engineer to distinguish the source and sink type quickly during debug. The ID is dynamic, but the type is fixed. Even in future, one pipeline has multiple same components, it will not cause confusion using component type. Not sure my thought is proper. Maybe you have another concern.
+ Rander
The component ID will be available by reading back debugFS and part of trace too.
Liam