On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:35:02PM +0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

...

+disable_xck:

• clk_disable(clock->xck);

+disable_ick:

• clk_disable(clock->ick);

+err:

• return ret;

}

I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ?

Thanks, I will submit a v3 to solve it.

Jiang