[alsa-devel] [PATCH v3] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params
From: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to decide which param to apply at runtime.
However, in case there is only single param configuration then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used or not used based on num_param. It is better to not allocate memory when there is only a single configuration. This change is to remedy that anomaly.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com --- Changes in this version: - Fixed the coding guideline comment from charles. Changes in v2: - Review comments from charles to move common function of error handling in seperate function. Changes in v1: - Included the review comments from charles regarding releasing memory in error path.
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index d55cac6..dbf3838 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -3778,18 +3778,27 @@ static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, return 0; }
-int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, - const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, - unsigned int num_params, - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink) +void +snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card, + unsigned long *private_value, + int num_params, + const char **w_param_text) +{ + int count; + + devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)*private_value); + for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) + devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]); + devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text); +} + +static struct snd_kcontrol_new * +snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card, + char *link_name, + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + int num_params, const char **w_param_text, + unsigned long *private_value) { - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template; - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; - char *link_name; - int ret, count; - unsigned long private_value; - const char **w_param_text; struct soc_enum w_param_enum[] = { SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(0, 0, 0, NULL), }; @@ -3798,19 +3807,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_get, snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put), }; + struct snd_kcontrol_new *kcontrol_news; const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *config = params; - - w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params, - sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!w_param_text) - return -ENOMEM; - - link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", - source->name, sink->name); - if (!link_name) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_w_param; - } + int count;
for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) { if (!config->stream_name) { @@ -3827,47 +3826,86 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, strlen(config->stream_name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL); } - if (!w_param_text[count]) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_link_name; - } + if (!w_param_text[count]) + goto outfree_w_param; config++; } + w_param_enum[0].items = num_params; w_param_enum[0].texts = w_param_text;
- memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template)); - template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM; - template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link; - template.name = link_name; - template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event; - template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU | - SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD; - template.num_kcontrols = 1; - /* duplicate w_param_enum on heap so that memory persists */ - private_value = + *private_value = (unsigned long) devm_kmemdup(card->dev, (void *)(kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value), sizeof(struct soc_enum), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!private_value) { + if (!*private_value) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", link_name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_link_name; + goto outfree_w_param; } - kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = private_value; + kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = *private_value; /* duplicate kcontrol_dai_link on heap so that memory persists */ - template.kcontrol_news = - devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0], + kcontrol_news = devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0], sizeof(struct snd_kcontrol_new), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!template.kcontrol_news) { + if (!kcontrol_news) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", link_name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_private_value; + goto outfree_w_param; } + return kcontrol_news;
+outfree_w_param: + snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, private_value, num_params, w_param_text); + return NULL; +} + +int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + unsigned int num_params, + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template; + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; + const char **w_param_text; + unsigned long private_value; + char *link_name; + int ret; + + link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", + source->name, sink->name); + if (!link_name) + return -ENOMEM; + + memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template)); + template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM; + template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link; + template.name = link_name; + template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event; + template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU | + SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD; + template.kcontrol_news = NULL; + + /* allocate memory for control, only in case of multiple configs */ + if (num_params > 1) { + w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params, + sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w_param_text) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto param_fail; + } + + template.num_kcontrols = 1; + template.kcontrol_news = + snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(card, + link_name, params, num_params, + w_param_text, &private_value); + if (!template.kcontrol_news) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto param_fail; + } + } dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(&card->dapm, &template); @@ -3899,15 +3937,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, devm_kfree(card->dev, w); outfree_kcontrol_news: devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)template.kcontrol_news); -outfree_private_value: - devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)private_value); -outfree_link_name: + snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, &private_value, num_params, w_param_text); +param_fail: devm_kfree(card->dev, link_name); - for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) - devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]); -outfree_w_param: - devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text); - return ret; }
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, yesanishhere@gmail.com wrote:
From: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to decide which param to apply at runtime.
However, in case there is only single param configuration then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used or not used based on num_param. It is better to not allocate memory when there is only a single configuration. This change is to remedy that anomaly.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Tested-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Thanks, Charles
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, yesanishhere@gmail.com wrote:
From: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to decide which param to apply at runtime.
However, in case there is only single param configuration then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used or not used based on num_param. It is better to not allocate memory when there is only a single configuration. This change is to remedy that anomaly.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Tested-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Charles, do you know if there is anything pending for this series to be picked up for merge in mark's tree?
Thanks, Charles
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:29:45PM -0700, anish kumar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:52:39PM -0700, yesanishhere@gmail.com wrote:
From: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to decide which param to apply at runtime.
However, in case there is only single param configuration then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used or not used based on num_param. It is better to not allocate memory when there is only a single configuration. This change is to remedy that anomaly.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Tested-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Charles, do you know if there is anything pending for this series to be picked up for merge in mark's tree?
Its been picked up that's what that email from Mark is letting you know. However, you do need to do an incremental patch on top of this one for the issues the Intel build bot spotted with the patch.
Thanks, Charles
The patch
ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params
has been applied to the asoc tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From 19ad683abc8534cd755403381c73c0ddce7b9f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:52:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Avoid creating kcontrol for params
Currently in codec to codec dai link if there are multiple params defined then dapm can use created kcontrol to decide which param to apply at runtime.
However, in case there is only single param configuration then there is no point in creating the kcontrol and also there is no point in allocating memory for kcontrol.
In the snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm function, there is memory allocation happening for kcontrol which is later used or not used based on num_param. It is better to not allocate memory when there is only a single configuration. This change is to remedy that anomaly.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar yesanishhere@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Tested-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index ba78a88d2af0..44aed3383c62 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -3778,18 +3778,27 @@ static int snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, return 0; }
-int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, - const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, - unsigned int num_params, - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink) +void +snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card, + unsigned long *private_value, + int num_params, + const char **w_param_text) +{ + int count; + + devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)*private_value); + for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) + devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]); + devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text); +} + +static struct snd_kcontrol_new * +snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(struct snd_soc_card *card, + char *link_name, + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + int num_params, const char **w_param_text, + unsigned long *private_value) { - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template; - struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; - char *link_name; - int ret, count; - unsigned long private_value; - const char **w_param_text; struct soc_enum w_param_enum[] = { SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(0, 0, 0, NULL), }; @@ -3798,19 +3807,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_get, snd_soc_dapm_dai_link_put), }; + struct snd_kcontrol_new *kcontrol_news; const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *config = params; - - w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params, - sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!w_param_text) - return -ENOMEM; - - link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", - source->name, sink->name); - if (!link_name) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_w_param; - } + int count;
for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) { if (!config->stream_name) { @@ -3827,47 +3826,86 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, strlen(config->stream_name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL); } - if (!w_param_text[count]) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_link_name; - } + if (!w_param_text[count]) + goto outfree_w_param; config++; } + w_param_enum[0].items = num_params; w_param_enum[0].texts = w_param_text;
- memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template)); - template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM; - template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link; - template.name = link_name; - template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event; - template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU | - SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD; - template.num_kcontrols = 1; - /* duplicate w_param_enum on heap so that memory persists */ - private_value = + *private_value = (unsigned long) devm_kmemdup(card->dev, (void *)(kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value), sizeof(struct soc_enum), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!private_value) { + if (!*private_value) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", link_name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_link_name; + goto outfree_w_param; } - kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = private_value; + kcontrol_dai_link[0].private_value = *private_value; /* duplicate kcontrol_dai_link on heap so that memory persists */ - template.kcontrol_news = - devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0], + kcontrol_news = devm_kmemdup(card->dev, &kcontrol_dai_link[0], sizeof(struct snd_kcontrol_new), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!template.kcontrol_news) { + if (!kcontrol_news) { dev_err(card->dev, "ASoC: Failed to create control for %s widget\n", link_name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto outfree_private_value; + goto outfree_w_param; } + return kcontrol_news;
+outfree_w_param: + snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, private_value, num_params, w_param_text); + return NULL; +} + +int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, + const struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *params, + unsigned int num_params, + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *source, + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *sink) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget template; + struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w; + const char **w_param_text; + unsigned long private_value; + char *link_name; + int ret; + + link_name = devm_kasprintf(card->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", + source->name, sink->name); + if (!link_name) + return -ENOMEM; + + memset(&template, 0, sizeof(template)); + template.reg = SND_SOC_NOPM; + template.id = snd_soc_dapm_dai_link; + template.name = link_name; + template.event = snd_soc_dai_link_event; + template.event_flags = SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU | SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU | + SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD; + template.kcontrol_news = NULL; + + /* allocate memory for control, only in case of multiple configs */ + if (num_params > 1) { + w_param_text = devm_kcalloc(card->dev, num_params, + sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w_param_text) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto param_fail; + } + + template.num_kcontrols = 1; + template.kcontrol_news = + snd_soc_dapm_alloc_kcontrol(card, + link_name, params, num_params, + w_param_text, &private_value); + if (!template.kcontrol_news) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto param_fail; + } + } dev_dbg(card->dev, "ASoC: adding %s widget\n", link_name);
w = snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(&card->dapm, &template); @@ -3899,15 +3937,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_card *card, devm_kfree(card->dev, w); outfree_kcontrol_news: devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)template.kcontrol_news); -outfree_private_value: - devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)private_value); -outfree_link_name: + snd_soc_dapm_free_kcontrol(card, &private_value, num_params, w_param_text); +param_fail: devm_kfree(card->dev, link_name); - for (count = 0 ; count < num_params; count++) - devm_kfree(card->dev, (void *)w_param_text[count]); -outfree_w_param: - devm_kfree(card->dev, w_param_text); - return ret; }
participants (4)
-
anish kumar -
Charles Keepax -
Mark Brown -
yesanishhere＠gmail.com