Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/7] mfd: ab8500-core: Apply the AB8500 CODEC's compatible string to its MFD cell
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree node.
Applied as well.
I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree node.
Applied as well.
I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
Fair enough, I'll keep this one for the next merge window.
Cheers, Samuel.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Provide a compatible string for the AB8500 CODEC to aid in configuration property look-up from its associated Device Tree node.
Applied as well.
I remain *deeply* unconvinced that this is tasteful design for the device tree bindings, and it's certainly not needed urgently for v3.6 as there's no DT bindings on the CODEC side.
Fair enough, I'll keep this one for the next merge window.
Chasing this, as it still doesn't appear in v3.7 -next.
Kind regards, Lee
participants (3)
-
Lee Jones -
Mark Brown -
Samuel Ortiz