[alsa-devel] [PATCH] asoc atmel_ssc: Don't try to free ssc if request failed
Hello,
Patch below fixes a segmentation fault in atmel_ssc_dai if ssc_request() fails.
We should only call ssc_free() when ssc_request() succeeds or bad things will happen.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood joachim.eastwood@jotron.com --- sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c index 7fbfa05..eda955b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c @@ -848,9 +848,10 @@ int atmel_ssc_set_audio(int ssc_id) if (IS_ERR(ssc)) pr_warn("Unable to parent ASoC SSC DAI on SSC: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(ssc)); - else + else { ssc_pdev->dev.parent = &(ssc->pdev->dev); - ssc_free(ssc); + ssc_free(ssc); + }
ret = platform_device_add(ssc_pdev); if (ret < 0)
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:59:10PM +0200, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
Hello,
Patch below fixes a segmentation fault in atmel_ssc_dai if ssc_request() fails.
We should only call ssc_free() when ssc_request() succeeds or bad things will happen.
Adding Liam for his review. Please CC maintainers on patches.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood joachim.eastwood@jotron.com
sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c index 7fbfa05..eda955b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c @@ -848,9 +848,10 @@ int atmel_ssc_set_audio(int ssc_id) if (IS_ERR(ssc)) pr_warn("Unable to parent ASoC SSC DAI on SSC: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(ssc));
- else
- else { ssc_pdev->dev.parent = &(ssc->pdev->dev);
- ssc_free(ssc);
ssc_free(ssc);
}
ret = platform_device_add(ssc_pdev); if (ret < 0)
-- 1.7.5.2
On 02/06/11 19:05, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:59:10PM +0200, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
Hello,
Patch below fixes a segmentation fault in atmel_ssc_dai if ssc_request() fails.
We should only call ssc_free() when ssc_request() succeeds or bad things will happen.
Adding Liam for his review. Please CC maintainers on patches.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood joachim.eastwood@jotron.com
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@ti.com
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:59:10PM +0200, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
Hello,
Patch below fixes a segmentation fault in atmel_ssc_dai if ssc_request() fails.
We should only call ssc_free() when ssc_request() succeeds or bad things will happen.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood joachim.eastwood@jotron.com
Applied, thanks. Please try to follow the patch format in SubmittingPatches - in particular, remember that the body of your mail is going to get used as the commit message.
participants (3)
-
Joachim Eastwood
-
Liam Girdwood
-
Mark Brown