[PATCH] ASoC: topology: Correct error handling in soc_tplg_dapm_widget_create()
Academic correction of error handling: In case the allocation of kc or kcontrol_type fails the correct label to jump is hdr_err since the template.sname has been also allocated at this point.
Fixes: d29d41e28eea6 ("ASoC: topology: Add support for multiple kcontrol types to a widget") Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com --- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c index 72e50df7052c..3bb90a819650 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c @@ -1436,12 +1436,12 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_widget_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg, template.num_kcontrols = le32_to_cpu(w->num_kcontrols); kc = devm_kcalloc(tplg->dev, le32_to_cpu(w->num_kcontrols), sizeof(*kc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!kc) - goto err; + goto hdr_err;
kcontrol_type = devm_kcalloc(tplg->dev, le32_to_cpu(w->num_kcontrols), sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL); if (!kcontrol_type) - goto err; + goto hdr_err;
for (i = 0; i < le32_to_cpu(w->num_kcontrols); i++) { control_hdr = (struct snd_soc_tplg_ctl_hdr *)tplg->pos;
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:49:57 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Academic correction of error handling: In case the allocation of kc or kcontrol_type fails the correct label to jump is hdr_err since the template.sname has been also allocated at this point.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: topology: Correct error handling in soc_tplg_dapm_widget_create() commit: 9c363532413cda3e2c6dfa10e5cca7cd221877a0
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Peter Ujfalusi