[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: Remove conditional dpcm_capture setting
From: Yong Zhi yong.zhi@intel.com
The dpcm_capture is set unconditionally, we can drop the conditional setting of it.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhi yong.zhi@intel.com Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com --- sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c index 2eec32846078..76ee2e35e1ef 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_rt5682.c @@ -793,7 +793,6 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link *sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev, } links[id].init = max_98390_spk_codec_init; links[id].ops = &max_98390_ops; - links[id].dpcm_capture = 1;
} else { max_98357a_dai_link(&links[id]);
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:50:12 +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
The dpcm_capture is set unconditionally, we can drop the conditional setting of it.
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: Remove conditional dpcm_capture setting commit: 3e1a334ad5b6e1aee25fd7f09400000f9b7b1f82
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Peter Ujfalusi