Re: [alsa-devel] [pulseaudio-discuss] snd_pcm_avail no reliable
9 Jun
2015
9 Jun
'15
11:08 a.m.
I tried using a smaller period_size (about 1/16 of hwbuf_size),
snd_pcm_avail returned a better value.
Period bytes = 2Kbytes which is still larger than the default rewind_safeguard 512 bytes
But cpu usage moved from 1% to 4%, since we are using it in a
automotive, we don`t care about power saving, I think it is acceptable.
But I`m not sure if there is any other down side about "time based
scheduling" ?
3450
Age (days ago)
3450
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Raymond Yau