Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] ARM: s3c64xx: Let amba-pl08x driver handle DMA
On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
One of the biggest roadblocks on the way of S3C64xx to DeviceTree support is its DMA driver, which is completely platform-specific and provides private API (s3c-dma), not even saying that its design is completely against multiplatform-awareness.
I tried to test this on my s3c64xx based system but it gave me a kernel that didn't boot far enough to give console output (there's some early init stuff that uses SPI...). That said, I needed:
diff --git a/drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c b/drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c index 210a893..0f49707 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c +++ b/drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int pl08x_request_mux(struct pl08x_dma_chan *plchan) int ret;
if (plchan->mux_use++ == 0 && pd->get_signal) {
ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);
Hmm, that's strange. The former is a completely valid piece of code...
get_signal is a macro defined in include/linux/signal.h. If that header gets included, neither of the two is valid.
Arnd
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:01:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
if (plchan->mux_use++ == 0 && pd->get_signal) {
ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);
Hmm, that's strange. The former is a completely valid piece of code...
get_signal is a macro defined in include/linux/signal.h. If that header gets included, neither of the two is valid.
Ah, that'll be it. I'll post a patch to rename...
participants (2)
-
Arnd Bergmann
-
Mark Brown