Hi J,

On 11/7/2012 23:16, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

On 15:44 Wed 07 Nov , Mark Brown wrote:

...

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

...

the one via ASoC for the driver with the pinctrl for now but MUST add it later

...

the arch/arm related via AT91 tree where the pinctrl is mandatory in the dtsi

...

I'm no going to spend hours to do the pinctrl to test Bo patch that he is supposed to have deon to test this code

...

As basically today on DT none of the board will work if BO does no provide the pinctrl so for me he MUST put in the dtsi

...

is it ok with you?

Or add the pinmux bindings for other IPs over in the pinmux branch and the pinmux binding for SSC here (which will help with bisection as the DT bindings for the audio will then always exist in conjunction with the .dtsi changes for them). Either way is fine with me; I'll leave things as they are until I see some new patches.

for where it's merge honestly I do not care much but the pinctrl must be handled correctly

I will send patches to add pinctrl support. For atmel ssc driver, it is simple, however for dtsi, which point should I based on? which git and which branch? Because, I am not sure which branch on git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git is the right point.

Thanks.

Best Regards, Bo Shen

Best Regards, J.

---

linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel