[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: aloop - do not reschedule timer if deleted
If the timer is deleted while the timer handler is running, it may get rescheduled and an unnecessary period elapsed will be sent.
Add a flag to reschedule the timer only if it has not been stopped.
Signed-off-by: Omair Mohammed Abdullah omair.m.abdullah@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vinod.koul@linux.intel.com --- sound/drivers/aloop.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/drivers/aloop.c b/sound/drivers/aloop.c index 0fe6d64..fec4e17 100644 --- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c +++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct loopback_pcm { unsigned long last_jiffies; struct timer_list timer; spinlock_t timer_lock; + bool timer_stopped; };
static struct platform_device *devices[SNDRV_CARDS]; @@ -166,12 +167,11 @@ static inline unsigned int get_rate_shift(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) return get_setup(dpcm)->rate_shift; }
-static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) +static void do_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) { unsigned long tick; unsigned int rate_shift = get_rate_shift(dpcm);
- spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); if (rate_shift != dpcm->pcm_rate_shift) { dpcm->pcm_rate_shift = rate_shift; dpcm->period_size_frac = frac_pos(dpcm, dpcm->pcm_period_size); @@ -184,6 +184,13 @@ static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) tick = (tick + dpcm->pcm_bps - 1) / dpcm->pcm_bps; dpcm->timer.expires = jiffies + tick; add_timer(&dpcm->timer); +} + +static inline void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) +{ + spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); + dpcm->timer_stopped = false; + do_timer_start(dpcm); spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
@@ -192,6 +199,7 @@ static inline void loopback_timer_stop(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); del_timer(&dpcm->timer); dpcm->timer.expires = 0; + dpcm->timer_stopped = true; spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
@@ -540,7 +548,13 @@ static void loopback_timer_function(unsigned long data)
running = loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable); if (running & (1 << dpcm->substream->stream)) { - loopback_timer_start(dpcm); + spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); + if (dpcm->timer_stopped) { + spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); + return; + } + do_timer_start(dpcm); + spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); if (dpcm->period_update_pending) { dpcm->period_update_pending = 0; snd_pcm_period_elapsed(dpcm->substream); @@ -670,6 +684,7 @@ static int loopback_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) } dpcm->loopback = loopback; dpcm->substream = substream; + dpcm->timer_stopped = true; setup_timer(&dpcm->timer, loopback_timer_function, (unsigned long)dpcm); spin_lock_init(&dpcm->timer_lock);
At Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:05:46 +0530, Omair Mohammed Abdullah wrote:
If the timer is deleted while the timer handler is running, it may get rescheduled and an unnecessary period elapsed will be sent.
Add a flag to reschedule the timer only if it has not been stopped.
In which situation is it rescheduled exactly?
Actually there is a small race in the check of running bit and the timer lock. Do you mean this?
If so, wouldn't it be cleaner to get rid of timer_lock and protect the whole start/stop with cable->lock, too, like below?
thanks,
Takashi
--- diff --git a/sound/drivers/aloop.c b/sound/drivers/aloop.c index 0fe6d64..1904046 100644 --- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c +++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c @@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ struct loopback_pcm { unsigned int last_drift; unsigned long last_jiffies; struct timer_list timer; - spinlock_t timer_lock; };
static struct platform_device *devices[SNDRV_CARDS]; @@ -166,12 +165,12 @@ static inline unsigned int get_rate_shift(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) return get_setup(dpcm)->rate_shift; }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) { unsigned long tick; unsigned int rate_shift = get_rate_shift(dpcm);
- spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); if (rate_shift != dpcm->pcm_rate_shift) { dpcm->pcm_rate_shift = rate_shift; dpcm->period_size_frac = frac_pos(dpcm, dpcm->pcm_period_size); @@ -184,15 +183,13 @@ static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) tick = (tick + dpcm->pcm_bps - 1) / dpcm->pcm_bps; dpcm->timer.expires = jiffies + tick; add_timer(&dpcm->timer); - spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static inline void loopback_timer_stop(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) { - spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); del_timer(&dpcm->timer); dpcm->timer.expires = 0; - spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
#define CABLE_VALID_PLAYBACK (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) @@ -274,8 +271,8 @@ static int loopback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->running |= stream; cable->pause &= ~stream; - spin_unlock(&cable->lock); loopback_timer_start(dpcm); + spin_unlock(&cable->lock); if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) loopback_active_notify(dpcm); break; @@ -283,23 +280,23 @@ static int loopback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->running &= ~stream; cable->pause &= ~stream; - spin_unlock(&cable->lock); loopback_timer_stop(dpcm); + spin_unlock(&cable->lock); if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) loopback_active_notify(dpcm); break; case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->pause |= stream; - spin_unlock(&cable->lock); loopback_timer_stop(dpcm); + spin_unlock(&cable->lock); break; case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: spin_lock(&cable->lock); dpcm->last_jiffies = jiffies; cable->pause &= ~stream; - spin_unlock(&cable->lock); loopback_timer_start(dpcm); + spin_unlock(&cable->lock); break; default: return -EINVAL; @@ -477,6 +474,7 @@ static inline void bytepos_finish(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm, dpcm->buf_pos %= dpcm->pcm_buffer_size; }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) { struct loopback_pcm *dpcm_play = @@ -485,9 +483,7 @@ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) cable->streams[SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE]; unsigned long delta_play = 0, delta_capt = 0; unsigned int running, count1, count2; - unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&cable->lock, flags); running = cable->running ^ cable->pause; if (running & (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) { delta_play = jiffies - dpcm_play->last_jiffies; @@ -529,32 +525,39 @@ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) bytepos_finish(dpcm_play, count1); bytepos_finish(dpcm_capt, count1); unlock: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cable->lock, flags); return running; }
static void loopback_timer_function(unsigned long data) { struct loopback_pcm *dpcm = (struct loopback_pcm *)data; - unsigned int running; + unsigned long flags;
- running = loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable); - if (running & (1 << dpcm->substream->stream)) { + spin_lock_irqsave(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags); + if (loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable) & (1 << dpcm->substream->stream)) { loopback_timer_start(dpcm); if (dpcm->period_update_pending) { dpcm->period_update_pending = 0; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags); + /* need to unlock before calling below */ snd_pcm_period_elapsed(dpcm->substream); + return; } } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags); }
static snd_pcm_uframes_t loopback_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) { struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime; struct loopback_pcm *dpcm = runtime->private_data; + snd_pcm_uframes_t pos;
+ spin_lock(&dpcm->cable->lock); loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable); - return bytes_to_frames(runtime, dpcm->buf_pos); + pos = dpcm->buf_pos; + spin_unlock(&dpcm->cable->lock); + return bytes_to_frames(runtime, pos); }
static struct snd_pcm_hardware loopback_pcm_hardware = @@ -672,7 +675,6 @@ static int loopback_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) dpcm->substream = substream; setup_timer(&dpcm->timer, loopback_timer_function, (unsigned long)dpcm); - spin_lock_init(&dpcm->timer_lock);
cable = loopback->cables[substream->number][dev]; if (!cable) {
If the timer is deleted while the timer handler is running, it may get rescheduled and an unnecessary period elapsed will be sent.
Add a flag to reschedule the timer only if it has not been stopped.
In which situation is it rescheduled exactly?
When the loopback_timer_stop() runs on one CPU while loopback_timer_function() runs on the other CPU. This causes the loopback_timer_function() to reschedule the timer beacuse del_timer() will not wait for the timer function to finish.
Actually there is a small race in the check of running bit and the timer lock. Do you mean this?
If so, wouldn't it be cleaner to get rid of timer_lock and protect the whole start/stop with cable->lock, too, like below?
Yes, I think this fixes the problem quite well.
thanks,
Takashi
diff --git a/sound/drivers/aloop.c b/sound/drivers/aloop.c index 0fe6d64..1904046 100644 --- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c +++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c @@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ struct loopback_pcm { unsigned int last_drift; unsigned long last_jiffies; struct timer_list timer;
spinlock_t timer_lock; };
static struct platform_device *devices[SNDRV_CARDS];
@@ -166,12 +165,12 @@ static inline unsigned int get_rate_shift(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) return get_setup(dpcm)->rate_shift; }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) { unsigned long tick; unsigned int rate_shift = get_rate_shift(dpcm);
- spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); if (rate_shift != dpcm->pcm_rate_shift) { dpcm->pcm_rate_shift = rate_shift; dpcm->period_size_frac = frac_pos(dpcm, dpcm->pcm_period_size);
@@ -184,15 +183,13 @@ static void loopback_timer_start(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) tick = (tick + dpcm->pcm_bps - 1) / dpcm->pcm_bps; dpcm->timer.expires = jiffies + tick; add_timer(&dpcm->timer);
- spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static inline void loopback_timer_stop(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm) {
spin_lock(&dpcm->timer_lock); del_timer(&dpcm->timer); dpcm->timer.expires = 0;
spin_unlock(&dpcm->timer_lock); }
#define CABLE_VALID_PLAYBACK (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
@@ -274,8 +271,8 @@ static int loopback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->running |= stream; cable->pause &= ~stream;
loopback_timer_start(dpcm);spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) loopback_active_notify(dpcm); break;spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
@@ -283,23 +280,23 @@ static int loopback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd) spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->running &= ~stream; cable->pause &= ~stream;
loopback_timer_stop(dpcm);spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) loopback_active_notify(dpcm); break; case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: spin_lock(&cable->lock); cable->pause |= stream;spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
loopback_timer_stop(dpcm);spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
break; case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: spin_lock(&cable->lock); dpcm->last_jiffies = jiffies; cable->pause &= ~stream;spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
loopback_timer_start(dpcm);spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
break; default: return -EINVAL;spin_unlock(&cable->lock);
@@ -477,6 +474,7 @@ static inline void bytepos_finish(struct loopback_pcm *dpcm, dpcm->buf_pos %= dpcm->pcm_buffer_size; }
+/* call in cable->lock */ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) { struct loopback_pcm *dpcm_play = @@ -485,9 +483,7 @@ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) cable->streams[SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE]; unsigned long delta_play = 0, delta_capt = 0; unsigned int running, count1, count2;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&cable->lock, flags); running = cable->running ^ cable->pause; if (running & (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) { delta_play = jiffies - dpcm_play->last_jiffies;
@@ -529,32 +525,39 @@ static unsigned int loopback_pos_update(struct loopback_cable *cable) bytepos_finish(dpcm_play, count1); bytepos_finish(dpcm_capt, count1); unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cable->lock, flags); return running; }
static void loopback_timer_function(unsigned long data) { struct loopback_pcm *dpcm = (struct loopback_pcm *)data;
unsigned int running;
- unsigned long flags;
- running = loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable);
- if (running & (1 << dpcm->substream->stream)) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags);
if (loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable) & (1 << dpcm->substream->stream)) { loopback_timer_start(dpcm); if (dpcm->period_update_pending) { dpcm->period_update_pending = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags);
/* need to unlock before calling below */ snd_pcm_period_elapsed(dpcm->substream);
return;
} }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpcm->cable->lock, flags); }
static snd_pcm_uframes_t loopback_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) { struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime; struct loopback_pcm *dpcm = runtime->private_data;
snd_pcm_uframes_t pos;
spin_lock(&dpcm->cable->lock); loopback_pos_update(dpcm->cable);
- return bytes_to_frames(runtime, dpcm->buf_pos);
pos = dpcm->buf_pos;
spin_unlock(&dpcm->cable->lock);
return bytes_to_frames(runtime, pos); }
static struct snd_pcm_hardware loopback_pcm_hardware =
@@ -672,7 +675,6 @@ static int loopback_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) dpcm->substream = substream; setup_timer(&dpcm->timer, loopback_timer_function, (unsigned long)dpcm);
spin_lock_init(&dpcm->timer_lock);
cable = loopback->cables[substream->number][dev]; if (!cable) {
Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
At Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:12:29 +0530, Omair Mohammed Abdullah wrote:
If the timer is deleted while the timer handler is running, it may get rescheduled and an unnecessary period elapsed will be sent.
Add a flag to reschedule the timer only if it has not been stopped.
In which situation is it rescheduled exactly?
When the loopback_timer_stop() runs on one CPU while loopback_timer_function() runs on the other CPU. This causes the loopback_timer_function() to reschedule the timer beacuse del_timer() will not wait for the timer function to finish.
Actually there is a small race in the check of running bit and the timer lock. Do you mean this?
If so, wouldn't it be cleaner to get rid of timer_lock and protect the whole start/stop with cable->lock, too, like below?
Yes, I think this fixes the problem quite well.
OK, now applied my patch. Thanks for checking.
Takashi
participants (2)
-
Omair Mohammed Abdullah
-
Takashi Iwai