[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: WM8580: Debug interface index
We want the index of DAI's driver here.
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar jassi.brar@samsung.com --- sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c index e2a9276..cb7765f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c @@ -507,13 +507,13 @@ static int wm8580_paif_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, }
/* Look up the SYSCLK ratio; accept only exact matches */ - ratio = wm8580->sysclk[dai->id] / params_rate(params); + ratio = wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id] / params_rate(params); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8580_sysclk_ratios); i++) if (ratio == wm8580_sysclk_ratios[i]) break; if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(wm8580_sysclk_ratios)) { dev_err(codec->dev, "Invalid clock ratio %d/%d\n", - wm8580->sysclk[dai->id], params_rate(params)); + wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id], params_rate(params)); return -EINVAL; } paifa |= i; @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int wm8580_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id,
switch (clk_id) { case WM8580_CLKSRC_ADCMCLK: - if (dai->id != WM8580_DAI_PAIFTX) + if (dai->driver->id != WM8580_DAI_PAIFTX) return -EINVAL; sel = 0 << sel_shift; break; @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int wm8580_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id, }
/* We really should validate PLL settings but not yet */ - wm8580->sysclk[dai->id] = freq; + wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id] = freq;
return snd_soc_update_bits(codec, WM8580_CLKSEL, sel_mask, sel); }
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:34 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
We want the index of DAI's driver here.
It's fine but could you add a little more context here.
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar jassi.brar@samsung.com
sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c index e2a9276..cb7765f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8580.c @@ -507,13 +507,13 @@ static int wm8580_paif_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, }
/* Look up the SYSCLK ratio; accept only exact matches */
- ratio = wm8580->sysclk[dai->id] / params_rate(params);
- ratio = wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id] / params_rate(params); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8580_sysclk_ratios); i++) if (ratio == wm8580_sysclk_ratios[i]) break; if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(wm8580_sysclk_ratios)) { dev_err(codec->dev, "Invalid clock ratio %d/%d\n",
wm8580->sysclk[dai->id], params_rate(params));
return -EINVAL; } paifa |= i;wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id], params_rate(params));
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int wm8580_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id,
switch (clk_id) { case WM8580_CLKSRC_ADCMCLK:
if (dai->id != WM8580_DAI_PAIFTX)
sel = 0 << sel_shift; break;if (dai->driver->id != WM8580_DAI_PAIFTX) return -EINVAL;
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int wm8580_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id, }
/* We really should validate PLL settings but not yet */
- wm8580->sysclk[dai->id] = freq;
wm8580->sysclk[dai->driver->id] = freq;
return snd_soc_update_bits(codec, WM8580_CLKSEL, sel_mask, sel);
}
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:36AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:34 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
We want the index of DAI's driver here.
It's fine but could you add a little more context here.
Yes, please. Indeed, the DAI ID should be being initialised from the driver ID by the core so it's a bit surprising if they diverge - why do we want the driver index? Though I've gone ahead and applied anyway as at worst it's a noop.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:36AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:34 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
We want the index of DAI's driver here.
It's fine but could you add a little more context here.
Yes, please. Indeed, the DAI ID should be being initialised from the driver ID by the core so it's a bit surprising if they diverge - why do we want the driver index? Though I've gone ahead and applied anyway as at worst it's a noop.
Just for the sake of consistency. We moved to using driver's id since the commit 'ASoC: multi-component - ASoC Multi-Component Support'.
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:26:43AM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
Just for the sake of consistency. We moved to using driver's id since the commit 'ASoC: multi-component - ASoC Multi-Component Support'.
That's not actually true - the ID is initialised by default from the driver, but the referenced copy is in the DAI runtime structure.
participants (4)
-
Jassi Brar
-
Jassi Brar
-
Liam Girdwood
-
Mark Brown