[PATCH] ALSA: emu10k1: set variables emu1010_routing_info and emu1010_pads_info storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:519:39: warning: symbol 'emu1010_routing_info' was not declared. Should it be static? sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:859:36: warning: symbol 'emu1010_pads_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are only used in their defining file, so it should be static
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com --- sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c index 3a7f25f81504..26ed7e2fe053 100644 --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ struct snd_emu1010_routing_info { unsigned n_ins; };
-const struct snd_emu1010_routing_info emu1010_routing_info[] = { +static const struct snd_emu1010_routing_info emu1010_routing_info[] = { { /* rev1 1010 */ .src_regs = emu1010_src_regs, @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ struct snd_emu1010_pads_info { unsigned n_adc_ctls, n_dac_ctls; };
-const struct snd_emu1010_pads_info emu1010_pads_info[] = { +static const struct snd_emu1010_pads_info emu1010_pads_info[] = { { /* rev1 1010 */ .adc_ctls = snd_emu1010_adc_pads,
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:38:26AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
smatch reports
^^^^^^ is this the best word to use here?
sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:519:39: warning: symbol 'emu1010_routing_info' was not declared. Should it be static? sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:859:36: warning: symbol 'emu1010_pads_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are only used in their defining file, so it should be static
^^ they
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de
(also amending one of the still pending patches. thanks!)
regards
On 5/18/23 6:58 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:38:26AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
smatch reports
^^^^^^ is this the best word to use here?
I have been running smatch against the whole tree for a while, using this preamble.
Many fixes later, for the most part the tree has been cleaned of this class of problems.
Tom
sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:519:39: warning: symbol 'emu1010_routing_info' was not declared. Should it be static? sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:859:36: warning: symbol 'emu1010_pads_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are only used in their defining file, so it should be static
^^ they
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de
(also amending one of the still pending patches. thanks!)
regards
On Thu, 18 May 2023 15:58:51 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:38:26AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
smatch reports
^^^^^^ is this the best word to use here?
Note that smatch is a name of a static analysis tool :)
sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:519:39: warning: symbol 'emu1010_routing_info' was not declared. Should it be static? sound/pci/emu10k1/emumixer.c:859:36: warning: symbol 'emu1010_pads_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are only used in their defining file, so it should be static
^^ they
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de
(also amending one of the still pending patches. thanks!)
Applied the patch now, thanks.
Takashi
participants (3)
-
Oswald Buddenhagen
-
Takashi Iwai
-
Tom Rix