[PATCH] ASoC: audio-graph-card2: fix index check on graph_parse_node_multi_nm()
commit d685aea5e0a8 ("ASoC: audio-graph-card2: fix off by one in graph_parse_node_multi_nm()") uses ">=" instead of ">" for index check, but it was wrong. The nm_idx will be increment at end of loop, thus, ">" is correct.
while (1) { ... => if (*nm_idx > nm_max) break; ... (*nm_idx)++; }
Without this patch, "Multi-Codec-1" sample on ${LINUX}/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2-custom-sample.dtsi will be error.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2.c b/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2.c index 9c94677f681a..62606e20be9a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2.c +++ b/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card2.c @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int graph_parse_node_multi_nm(struct snd_soc_dai_link *dai_link, struct device_node *mcodec_port; int codec_idx;
- if (*nm_idx >= nm_max) + if (*nm_idx > nm_max) break;
mcpu_ep_n = of_get_next_child(mcpu_port, mcpu_ep_n);
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:10:15 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
commit d685aea5e0a8 ("ASoC: audio-graph-card2: fix off by one in graph_parse_node_multi_nm()") uses ">=" instead of ">" for index check, but it was wrong. The nm_idx will be increment at end of loop, thus, ">" is correct.
while (1) { ... => if (*nm_idx > nm_max) break; ... (*nm_idx)++; }
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: audio-graph-card2: fix index check on graph_parse_node_multi_nm() commit: 301bda18ac735eaaad5823dbdd067b3b2728c780
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Kuninori Morimoto -
Mark Brown