I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a.c b/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a.c index 7692265..77fc293 100644 --- a/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a.c +++ b/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a.c @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ static int dma1[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* PnP setup */ static int dma2[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* PnP setup */ static int clockfreq[SNDRV_CARDS];

-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for ad1816a based soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for ad1816a based soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable ad1816a based soundcard."); -module_param_array(clockfreq, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(clockfreq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(clockfreq, "Clock frequency for ad1816a driver (default = 0).");

static struct pnp_card_device_id snd_ad1816a_pnpids[] = {