[RESEND][PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cppcheck fixups
Hi Mark Cc Takashi
This is resend of posted patch. This patch-set fixes the issues which is reported by cppcheck.
Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
control_message() might be called with pao = NULL. Here indicates control_message() as sample.
(B) static void control_message(struct hpi_adapter_obj *pao, ...) { ^^^ struct hpi_hw_obj *phw = pao->priv; ... ^^^ }
(A) void _HPI_6205(struct hpi_adapter_obj *pao, ...) { ^^^ ... case HPI_OBJ_CONTROL: (B) control_message(pao, phm, phr); break; ^^^ ... }
void HPI_6205(...) { ... (A) _HPI_6205(NULL, phm, phr); ... ^^^^ }
Therefore, We will get too many warning via cppcheck, like below
sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:238:27: warning: Possible null pointer dereference: pao [nullPointer] struct hpi_hw_obj *phw = pao->priv; ^ sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:433:13: note: Calling function '_HPI_6205', 1st argument 'NULL' value is 0 _HPI_6205(NULL, phm, phr); ^ sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:401:20: note: Calling function 'control_message', 1st argument 'pao' value is 0 control_message(pao, phm, phr); ^ Set phr->error like many functions doing, and don't call _HPI_6205() with NULL.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c b/sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c index 27e11b5f70b9..c7d7eff86727 100644 --- a/sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c +++ b/sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ void HPI_6205(struct hpi_message *phm, struct hpi_response *phr) pao = hpi_find_adapter(phm->adapter_index); } else { /* subsys messages don't address an adapter */ - _HPI_6205(NULL, phm, phr); + phr->error = HPI_ERROR_INVALID_OBJ_INDEX; return; }
tuning_ctl_set() might have buffer overrun at (X) if it didn't break from loop by matching (A).
static int tuning_ctl_set(...) { for (i = 0; i < TUNING_CTLS_COUNT; i++) (A) if (nid == ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].nid) break;
snd_hda_power_up(...); (X) dspio_set_param(..., ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].mid, ...); snd_hda_power_down(...); ^
return 1; }
We will get below error by cppcheck
sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c:4229:2: note: After for loop, i has value 12 for (i = 0; i < TUNING_CTLS_COUNT; i++) ^ sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c:4234:43: note: Array index out of bounds dspio_set_param(codec, ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].mid, 0x20, ^ This patch cares non match case.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com --- sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c index 0a292bf271f2..5ce4b5f62983 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_ca0132.c @@ -4228,8 +4228,10 @@ static int tuning_ctl_set(struct hda_codec *codec, hda_nid_t nid,
for (i = 0; i < TUNING_CTLS_COUNT; i++) if (nid == ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].nid) - break; + goto found;
+ return -EINVAL; +found: snd_hda_power_up(codec); dspio_set_param(codec, ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].mid, 0x20, ca0132_tuning_ctls[i].req,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:12:13AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi Mark Cc Takashi
This is resend of posted patch. This patch-set fixes the issues which is reported by cppcheck.
Your subject line says these are ASoC patches but they're actually ALSA patches - perhaps this cased Takashi to miss them?
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
Hi Mark
This is resend of posted patch. This patch-set fixes the issues which is reported by cppcheck.
Your subject line says these are ASoC patches but they're actually ALSA patches - perhaps this cased Takashi to miss them?
Oops, indeed. Sorry about that. I will post it as ALSA patch.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
participants (2)
-
Kuninori Morimoto -
Mark Brown