[PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5d9c1e9eaf5f3afb95e5d86548020882.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties: compatible: items: - enum: + - renesas,r9a07g043-ssi # RZ/G2UL - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi # RZ/G2{L,LC} - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi # RZ/V2L - const: renesas,rz-ssi @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties: minItems: 1 maxItems: 2 description: - The first cell represents a phandle to dmac + The first cell represents a phandle to dmac. The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI port connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration parameters.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ed75bd1c5039f5d61a1c57e65cd58c9e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 23/04/2022 15:31, Biju Das wrote:
Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Best regards, Krzysztof
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4f6d66ae482f59501fa4224f9202ba9b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:32 PM Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com wrote:
Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5d9c1e9eaf5f3afb95e5d86548020882.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi All,
Gentle ping.
Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.
Cheers, Biju
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC
Document RZ/G2U2L SSI bindings. RZ/G2UL SSI is identical to one found on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible string "renesas,rz-ssi" will be used as a fallback.
While at it add a '.' at the end of dmas description for the first cell.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml index 7e8d252f7bca..0d9840375132 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rz-ssi.yaml @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ properties: compatible: items: - enum:
- renesas,r9a07g043-ssi # RZ/G2UL - renesas,r9a07g044-ssi # RZ/G2{L,LC} - renesas,r9a07g054-ssi # RZ/V2L - const: renesas,rz-ssi
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ properties: minItems: 1 maxItems: 2 description:
The first cell represents a phandle to dmac
The first cell represents a phandle to dmac. The second cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the SSI
port connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration parameters. -- 2.25.1
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d930951cb00393ecf9c3db3a56d78fa9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
Hi All,
Gentle ping.
Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the discussion is being addressed.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5d9c1e9eaf5f3afb95e5d86548020882.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the feedback.
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas,rz-ssi: Document RZ/G2UL SoC
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:49:22AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
Hi All,
Gentle ping.
Are we happy with this patch? Please let me know.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
OK. Agreed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
OK. Will rebase and resend this patch.
Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the discussion is being addressed.
Agreed.
Regards, Biju
participants (4)
-
Biju Das
-
Geert Uytterhoeven
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski
-
Mark Brown