[alsa-devel] [PATCH 21/21]sound:soc:samsung:dma.c remove one to many l's in the word.
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com
--- sound/soc/samsung/dma.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c index 2124019..807efa5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ dma_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) /* we seem to be getting the odd error from the pcm library due * to out-of-bounds pointers. this is maybe due to the dma engine * not having loaded the new values for the channel before being - * callled... (todo - fix ) + * called... (todo - fix ) */
if (res >= snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream)) {
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com wrote:
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassi.brar@samsung.com
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 16:00 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com wrote:
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com
Acked-by: Jassi Brar jassi.brar@samsung.com
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:16:37PM -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com
Applied.
Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working on.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:16:37PM -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock justinmattock@gmail.com
Applied.
I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working on.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
Applied.
I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
I do - it's ceade6c81bd913b23bffb3d80909ea430850c79b. I rewrote the subject line because:
Please remember to CC maintainers on patches as covered in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, even trivial patches should be made visible to maintainers. Please also try to use changelogs for your patch which resemble other changelogs for the code area you're working on.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:26:16PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
Applied.
I don't see it in linux-next as of today though ... ?
I do - it's ceade6c81bd913b23bffb3d80909ea430850c79b.
Bah, I had bogus clone of linux-next, sorry for the noise.
participants (5)
-
Jassi Brar -
Jiri Kosina -
Justin P. Mattock -
Liam Girdwood -
Mark Brown