[PATCH] ASoC: amd: Removing unnecessary instance initialization
In DMA pointer the initialzation of instance is of no use. In fact it will reinitialize the instance variable which is already opened and functional.
Signed-off-by: Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@amd.com --- sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c index 620b568..d8f554f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c @@ -303,7 +303,6 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t acp3x_dma_pointer(struct snd_soc_component *component, { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *prtd; struct snd_soc_card *card; - struct acp3x_platform_info *pinfo; struct i2s_stream_instance *rtd; u32 pos; u32 buffersize; @@ -312,13 +311,6 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t acp3x_dma_pointer(struct snd_soc_component *component, prtd = substream->private_data; card = prtd->card; rtd = substream->runtime->private_data; - pinfo = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(card); - if (pinfo) { - if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) - rtd->i2s_instance = pinfo->play_i2s_instance; - else - rtd->i2s_instance = pinfo->cap_i2s_instance; - }
buffersize = frames_to_bytes(substream->runtime, substream->runtime->buffer_size);
On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:16 +0530, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:
In DMA pointer the initialzation of instance is of no use. In fact it will reinitialize the instance variable which is already opened and functional.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: amd: Removing unnecessary instance initialization commit: 4a0434502191347ba8f99468f2fb2cdddc20d381
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao