[PATCH -next] SoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix boolreturn.cocci warning
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true/false instead of 1/0. Fix the following coccicheck warning: ./sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c:1190:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'wcd938x_volatile_register' with return type bool. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> --- sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c index 2cf6145..cfe00536 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c @@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ static bool wcd938x_writeable_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) static bool wcd938x_volatile_register(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) { if (reg <= WCD938X_BASE_ADDRESS) - return 0; + return false; if (reg == WCD938X_DIGITAL_SWR_TX_CLK_RATE) return true; -- 1.8.3.1
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:45:35 +0800, Yang Li wrote:
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true/false instead of 1/0.
Fix the following coccicheck warning: ./sound/soc/codecs/wcd938x.c:1190:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'wcd938x_volatile_register' with return type bool.
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] SoC: codecs: wcd938x: fix boolreturn.cocci warning commit: 83bd5c53ebf6f2f7b8b0b7db4c038ad7a5a5448a All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown -
Yang Li