[PATCH] ASoC: tlv320adc3xxx: Don't strip remove function when driver is builtin
Using __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being discarded with SND_SOC_TLV320ADC3XXX=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.
This also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:
WARNING: modpost: sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-tlv320adc3xxx: section mismatch in reference: adc3xxx_i2c_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -> adc3xxx_i2c_remove (section: .exit.text)
(which only happens with SND_SOC_TLV320ADC3XXX=m).
Fixes: e9a3b57efd28 ("ASoC: codec: tlv320adc3xxx: New codec driver") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de --- Hello,
note that this patch only applies as is after commit 4e8ff3587868 ("ASoC: codecs: tlv320adc3xxx: Wrap adc3xxx_i2c_remove() in __exit_p()") which was the wrong approach to fix the build error.
Best regards Uwe
sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adc3xxx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adc3xxx.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adc3xxx.c index 420bbf588efe..e100cc9f5c19 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adc3xxx.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adc3xxx.c @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ static int adc3xxx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) return ret; }
-static void __exit adc3xxx_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) +static void adc3xxx_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) { struct adc3xxx *adc3xxx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver adc3xxx_i2c_driver = { .of_match_table = tlv320adc3xxx_of_match, }, .probe = adc3xxx_i2c_probe, - .remove = __exit_p(adc3xxx_i2c_remove), + .remove = adc3xxx_i2c_remove, .id_table = adc3xxx_i2c_id, };
base-commit: 8ffc8b1bbd505e27e2c8439d326b6059c906c9dd
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 3:39 PM Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de wrote:
Using __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being discarded with SND_SOC_TLV320ADC3XXX=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.
This also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:
WARNING: modpost: sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-tlv320adc3xxx: section mismatch in reference: adc3xxx_i2c_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -> adc3xxx_i2c_remove (section: .exit.text)
(which only happens with SND_SOC_TLV320ADC3XXX=m).
Fixes: e9a3b57efd28 ("ASoC: codec: tlv320adc3xxx: New codec driver") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Hello,
note that this patch only applies as is after commit 4e8ff3587868 ("ASoC: codecs: tlv320adc3xxx: Wrap adc3xxx_i2c_remove() in __exit_p()") which was the wrong approach to fix the build error.
Sorry, my bad... Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert@linux-m68k.org
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:51 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Using __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being discarded with SND_SOC_TLV320ADC3XXX=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.
This also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: tlv320adc3xxx: Don't strip remove function when driver is builtin commit: f31e0d0c2cad23e0cc48731634f85bb2d8707790
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (3)
-
Geert Uytterhoeven
-
Mark Brown
-
Uwe Kleine-König