A bug reported by one of my customers that the order of TAS2781 calibrated-data is incorrect, the correct way is to move R0_Low and insert it between R0 and InvR0.

Fixes: 4fe238513407 ("ALSA: hda/tas2781: Move and unified the calibrated-data getting function for SPI and I2C into the tas2781_hda lib") Signed-off-by: Shenghao Ding shenghao-ding@ti.com

--- v4: - Add missing base into cali_cnv(). v3: - Take Tiwai's advice on cali_cnv() to make it more simpler. v2: - Submit to the sound branch maintained by Tiwai instead of linux-next branch - Drop other fix --- sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/tas2781_hda.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/tas2781_hda.c b/sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/tas2781_hda.c index f46d2e06c64f..536940c78f00 100644 --- a/sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/tas2781_hda.c +++ b/sound/hda/codecs/side-codecs/tas2781_hda.c @@ -33,6 +33,23 @@ const efi_guid_t tasdev_fct_efi_guid[] = { }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(tasdev_fct_efi_guid, "SND_HDA_SCODEC_TAS2781");

+/* + * The order of calibrated-data writing function is a bit different from the + * order in UEFI. Here is the conversion to match the order of calibrated-data + * writing function. + */ +static void cali_cnv(unsigned char *data, unsigned int base, int offset) +{ + struct cali_reg reg_data; + + memcpy(&reg_data, &data[base], sizeof(reg_data)); + /* the data order has to be swapped between r0_low_reg and inv0_reg */ + swap(reg_data.r0_low_reg, reg_data.invr0_reg); + + cpu_to_be32_array((__force __be32 *)(data + offset + 1), + (u32 *)&reg_data, TASDEV_CALIB_N); +} + static void tas2781_apply_calib(struct tasdevice_priv *p) { struct calidata *cali_data = &p->cali_data; @@ -103,8 +120,7 @@ static void tas2781_apply_calib(struct tasdevice_priv *p)

data[l] = k; oft++; - for (i = 0; i < TASDEV_CALIB_N * 4; i++) - data[l + i + 1] = data[4 * oft + i]; + cali_cnv(data, 4 * oft, l); k++; } } @@ -130,9 +146,8 @@ static void tas2781_apply_calib(struct tasdevice_priv *p)

for (j = p->ndev - 1; j >= 0; j--) { l = j * (cali_data->cali_dat_sz_per_dev + 1); - for (i = TASDEV_CALIB_N * 4; i > 0 ; i--) - data[l + i] = data[p->index * 5 + i]; - data[l+i] = j; + cali_cnv(data, cali_data->cali_dat_sz_per_dev * j, l); + data[l] = j; } }