[PATCH 1/4] soundwire: stream: Add missing clear of alloc_slave_rt
The current path that skips allocating the slave runtime does not clear the alloc_slave_rt flag, this is clearly incorrect. Add the missing clear, so the runtime won't be erroneously cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com --- drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index c2191c07442b0..379228f221869 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -2021,8 +2021,10 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
skip_alloc_master_rt: s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream); - if (s_rt) + if (s_rt) { + alloc_slave_rt = false; goto skip_alloc_slave_rt; + }
s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt); if (!s_rt) {
The block_offset variable in _sdw_compute_port_params adds nothing either functionally or in terms of code clarity, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com --- drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c index 325c475b6a66d..31162f2b56381 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c @@ -139,20 +139,16 @@ static void _sdw_compute_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus, { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; int hstop = bus->params.col - 1; - int block_offset, port_bo, i; + int port_bo, i;
/* Run loop for all groups to compute transport parameters */ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { port_bo = 1; - block_offset = 1;
list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) { - sdw_compute_master_ports(m_rt, ¶ms[i], - port_bo, hstop); + sdw_compute_master_ports(m_rt, ¶ms[i], port_bo, hstop);
- block_offset += m_rt->ch_count * - m_rt->stream->params.bps; - port_bo = block_offset; + port_bo += m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps; }
hstop = hstop - params[i].hwidth;
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
The block_offset variable in _sdw_compute_port_params adds nothing either functionally or in terms of code clarity, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
This one is easy enough, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c index 325c475b6a66d..31162f2b56381 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c @@ -139,20 +139,16 @@ static void _sdw_compute_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus, { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; int hstop = bus->params.col - 1;
- int block_offset, port_bo, i;
int port_bo, i;
/* Run loop for all groups to compute transport parameters */ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { port_bo = 1;
block_offset = 1;list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &bus->m_rt_list, bus_node) {
sdw_compute_master_ports(m_rt, ¶ms[i],port_bo, hstop);
sdw_compute_master_ports(m_rt, ¶ms[i], port_bo, hstop);
block_offset += m_rt->ch_count *m_rt->stream->params.bps;port_bo = block_offset;
port_bo += m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps;}
hstop = hstop - params[i].hwidth;
There is a lot of code using gotos to skip small sections of code, this is a fairly dubious use of a goto, especially when the level of intentation is really low. Most of this code doesn't even breach 80 characters when naively shifted over.
Simplify the code a bit, by replacing these unnecessary gotos with simple ifs.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com --- drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index 379228f221869..248ab243ec6e4 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -1355,25 +1355,23 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, return -EINVAL; }
- if (!update_params) - goto program_params; - - /* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth */ - /* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */ - bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate * - m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps; - - /* Compute params */ - if (bus->compute_params) { - ret = bus->compute_params(bus); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n", - ret); - goto restore_params; + if (update_params) { + /* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth */ + /* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */ + bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate * + m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps; + + /* Compute params */ + if (bus->compute_params) { + ret = bus->compute_params(bus); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n", + ret); + goto restore_params; + } } }
-program_params: /* Program params */ ret = sdw_program_params(bus, true); if (ret < 0) { @@ -1864,7 +1862,7 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; - bool alloc_master_rt = true; + bool alloc_master_rt = false; int ret;
mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock); @@ -1886,30 +1884,25 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus, * it first), if so skip allocation and go to configuration */ m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(bus, stream); - if (m_rt) { - alloc_master_rt = false; - goto skip_alloc_master_rt; - } - - m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream); if (!m_rt) { - dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", - __func__, stream->name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto unlock; - } -skip_alloc_master_rt: - - if (sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt)) - goto skip_alloc_master_port; + m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream); + if (!m_rt) { + dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", + __func__, stream->name); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unlock; + }
- ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports); - if (ret) - goto alloc_error; + alloc_master_rt = true; + }
- stream->m_rt_count++; + if (!sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt)) { + ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports); + if (ret) + goto alloc_error;
-skip_alloc_master_port: + stream->m_rt_count++; + }
ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config); if (ret < 0) @@ -1990,8 +1983,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave, { struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt; struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; - bool alloc_master_rt = true; - bool alloc_slave_rt = true; + bool alloc_master_rt = false; + bool alloc_slave_rt = false;
int ret;
@@ -2002,47 +1995,41 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave, * and go to configuration */ m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(slave->bus, stream); - if (m_rt) { - alloc_master_rt = false; - goto skip_alloc_master_rt; - } - - /* - * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid. - * So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it. - */ - m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream); if (!m_rt) { - dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", - __func__, stream->name); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto unlock; - } + /* + * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid. + * So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it. + */ + m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream); + if (!m_rt) { + dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", + __func__, stream->name); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unlock; + }
-skip_alloc_master_rt: - s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream); - if (s_rt) { - alloc_slave_rt = false; - goto skip_alloc_slave_rt; + alloc_master_rt = true; }
- s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt); + s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream); if (!s_rt) { - dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", stream->name); - alloc_slave_rt = false; - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto alloc_error; - } + s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt); + if (!s_rt) { + dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", + stream->name); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto alloc_error; + }
-skip_alloc_slave_rt: - if (sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt)) - goto skip_port_alloc; + alloc_slave_rt = true; + }
- ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports); - if (ret) - goto alloc_error; + if (!sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt)) { + ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports); + if (ret) + goto alloc_error; + }
-skip_port_alloc: ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config); if (ret) goto unlock;
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
There is a lot of code using gotos to skip small sections of code, this is a fairly dubious use of a goto, especially when the level of intentation is really low. Most of this code doesn't even breach 80 characters when naively shifted over.
Simplify the code a bit, by replacing these unnecessary gotos with simple ifs.
it's probably ok but far from simple to review with the inverted states for variables. I don't have the time and energy to revisit this...
I would err on the side of if it ain't broke don't fix it here.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index 379228f221869..248ab243ec6e4 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -1355,25 +1355,23 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, return -EINVAL; }
if (!update_params)goto program_params;/* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth *//* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate *m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps;/* Compute params */if (bus->compute_params) {ret = bus->compute_params(bus);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n",ret);goto restore_params;
if (update_params) {/* Increment cumulative bus bandwidth *//* TODO: Update this during Device-Device support */bus->params.bandwidth += m_rt->stream->params.rate *m_rt->ch_count * m_rt->stream->params.bps;/* Compute params */if (bus->compute_params) {ret = bus->compute_params(bus);if (ret < 0) {dev_err(bus->dev, "Compute params failed: %d\n",ret);goto restore_params;} }-program_params: /* Program params */ ret = sdw_program_params(bus, true); if (ret < 0) { @@ -1864,7 +1862,7 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
- bool alloc_master_rt = true;
bool alloc_master_rt = false; int ret;
mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
@@ -1886,30 +1884,25 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus, * it first), if so skip allocation and go to configuration */ m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(bus, stream);
- if (m_rt) {
alloc_master_rt = false;goto skip_alloc_master_rt;- }
- m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream); if (!m_rt) {
dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",__func__, stream->name);ret = -ENOMEM;goto unlock;- }
-skip_alloc_master_rt:
- if (sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt))
goto skip_alloc_master_port;
m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream);if (!m_rt) {dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",__func__, stream->name);ret = -ENOMEM;goto unlock;}
- ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports);
- if (ret)
goto alloc_error;
alloc_master_rt = true;- }
- stream->m_rt_count++;
- if (!sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt)) {
ret = sdw_master_port_alloc(m_rt, num_ports);if (ret)goto alloc_error;-skip_alloc_master_port:
stream->m_rt_count++;}
ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config); if (ret < 0)
@@ -1990,8 +1983,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave, { struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt; struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
- bool alloc_master_rt = true;
- bool alloc_slave_rt = true;
bool alloc_master_rt = false;
bool alloc_slave_rt = false;
int ret;
@@ -2002,47 +1995,41 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave, * and go to configuration */ m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(slave->bus, stream);
- if (m_rt) {
alloc_master_rt = false;goto skip_alloc_master_rt;- }
- /*
* If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.* So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it.*/- m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream); if (!m_rt) {
dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",__func__, stream->name);ret = -ENOMEM;goto unlock;- }
/** If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.* So, allocate m_rt and add Slave to it.*/m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(slave->bus, stream);if (!m_rt) {dev_err(&slave->dev, "%s: Master runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",__func__, stream->name);ret = -ENOMEM;goto unlock;}-skip_alloc_master_rt:
- s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream);
- if (s_rt) {
alloc_slave_rt = false;goto skip_alloc_slave_rt;
alloc_master_rt = true;
- s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);
- s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream); if (!s_rt) {
dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", stream->name);alloc_slave_rt = false;ret = -ENOMEM;goto alloc_error;- }
s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);if (!s_rt) {dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n",stream->name);ret = -ENOMEM;goto alloc_error;}-skip_alloc_slave_rt:
- if (sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt))
goto skip_port_alloc;
alloc_slave_rt = true;- }
- ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports);
- if (ret)
goto alloc_error;
- if (!sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt)) {
ret = sdw_slave_port_alloc(slave, s_rt, num_ports);if (ret)goto alloc_error;- }
-skip_port_alloc: ret = sdw_master_rt_config(m_rt, stream_config); if (ret) goto unlock;
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:37:33AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
There is a lot of code using gotos to skip small sections of code, this is a fairly dubious use of a goto, especially when the level of intentation is really low. Most of this code doesn't even breach 80 characters when naively shifted over.
Simplify the code a bit, by replacing these unnecessary gotos with simple ifs.
it's probably ok but far from simple to review with the inverted states for variables. I don't have the time and energy to revisit this...
I would err on the side of if it ain't broke don't fix it here.
The current code is pretty oddly written, as you say it does work through. I will try splitting the patch into separate patches for inverting the varible and dropping the goto's. That should make review slightly easier and both changes make the code clearer in their own right anyway.
Thanks, Charles
Every error path in do_bank_switch prints an error message so there is no need for the callers to also print error messages. Indeed in multi-master cases these extra messages are confusing because they print out against a random bus device whereas the do_bank_switch messages print against the bus that actually failed.
This also allows clean up of a couple of if's and variable initialisations that were only there to silence potentially uninitialised variable warnings on the bus variable.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com --- drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index 248ab243ec6e4..b5c7a52aac19e 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, bool update_params) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; - struct sdw_bus *bus = NULL; + struct sdw_bus *bus; struct sdw_master_prop *prop; struct sdw_bus_params params; int ret; @@ -1380,16 +1380,9 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, } }
- if (!bus) { - pr_err("Configuration error in %s\n", __func__); - return -EINVAL; - } - ret = do_bank_switch(stream); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret); + if (ret < 0) goto restore_params; - }
list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) { bus = m_rt->bus; @@ -1465,7 +1458,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_prepare_stream); static int _sdw_enable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt; - struct sdw_bus *bus = NULL; + struct sdw_bus *bus; int ret;
/* Enable Master(s) and Slave(s) port(s) associated with stream */ @@ -1488,16 +1481,9 @@ static int _sdw_enable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) } }
- if (!bus) { - pr_err("Configuration error in %s\n", __func__); - return -EINVAL; - } - ret = do_bank_switch(stream); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - }
stream->state = SDW_STREAM_ENABLED; return 0; @@ -1571,10 +1557,8 @@ static int _sdw_disable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) }
ret = do_bank_switch(stream); - if (ret < 0) { - pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - }
/* make sure alternate bank (previous current) is also disabled */ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
Every error path in do_bank_switch prints an error message so there is no need for the callers to also print error messages. Indeed in multi-master cases these extra messages are confusing because they print out against a random bus device whereas the do_bank_switch messages print against the bus that actually failed.
Errm, what?
There is no way to know which bus failed in multi-master mode, and the 'stream' can span multiple buses so the use of pr_err was intentional. There's just no other way to report issues, and I don't see why one would remove such logs and fail silently.
I just don't get what you are trying to address.
This also allows clean up of a couple of if's and variable initialisations that were only there to silence potentially uninitialised variable warnings on the bus variable.
That should be a separate patch IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index 248ab243ec6e4..b5c7a52aac19e 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, bool update_params) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
- struct sdw_bus *bus = NULL;
- struct sdw_bus *bus; struct sdw_master_prop *prop; struct sdw_bus_params params; int ret;
@@ -1380,16 +1380,9 @@ static int _sdw_prepare_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream, } }
- if (!bus) {
pr_err("Configuration error in %s\n", __func__);return -EINVAL;- }
- ret = do_bank_switch(stream);
- if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- if (ret < 0) goto restore_params;
}
list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) { bus = m_rt->bus;
@@ -1465,7 +1458,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_prepare_stream); static int _sdw_enable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) { struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
- struct sdw_bus *bus = NULL;
struct sdw_bus *bus; int ret;
/* Enable Master(s) and Slave(s) port(s) associated with stream */
@@ -1488,16 +1481,9 @@ static int _sdw_enable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) } }
- if (!bus) {
pr_err("Configuration error in %s\n", __func__);return -EINVAL;- }
- ret = do_bank_switch(stream);
- if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- if (ret < 0) return ret;
}
stream->state = SDW_STREAM_ENABLED; return 0;
@@ -1571,10 +1557,8 @@ static int _sdw_disable_stream(struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream) }
ret = do_bank_switch(stream);
- if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: do_bank_switch failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- if (ret < 0) return ret;
}
/* make sure alternate bank (previous current) is also disabled */ list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:34:10AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
Every error path in do_bank_switch prints an error message so there is no need for the callers to also print error messages. Indeed in multi-master cases these extra messages are confusing because they print out against a random bus device whereas the do_bank_switch messages print against the bus that actually failed.
Errm, what?
There is no way to know which bus failed in multi-master mode, and the 'stream' can span multiple buses so the use of pr_err was intentional.
Apologies this is the commit message not quite keeping pace with the code base. Originally when I wrote the patch the error message after do_bank_switch were a "dev_err(bus->dev", that was then fixed up in commit d014688eb373 ("soundwire: stream: remove bus->dev from logs on multiple buses").
There's just no other way to report issues, and I don't see why one would remove such logs and fail silently.
I just don't get what you are trying to address.
The current code would say produce something like:
Bank switch failed: -5 _sdw_prepare_stream: do_bank_switch failed: -5
I am sensing you are keen to keep both error messages, so fair enough I will drop that. Although worth noting originally before that patch I mention above this would have been:
Bank switch failed: -5 do_bank_switch failed: -5
Which is really what I was attempting to address, that is clearly redundant. Now with the addition of the function in the print I guess it is slightly less redundant.
This also allows clean up of a couple of if's and variable initialisations that were only there to silence potentially uninitialised variable warnings on the bus variable.
That should be a separate patch IMHO.
I will trim the patch down to leave the duplicate error messages and just remove those bits.
Thanks, Charles
On 6/1/23 11:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
The current path that skips allocating the slave runtime does not clear the alloc_slave_rt flag, this is clearly incorrect. Add the missing clear, so the runtime won't be erroneously cleaned up.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Sounds about right, thanks
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c index c2191c07442b0..379228f221869 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c @@ -2021,8 +2021,10 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
skip_alloc_master_rt: s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream);
- if (s_rt)
if (s_rt) {
alloc_slave_rt = false;goto skip_alloc_slave_rt;
}
s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt); if (!s_rt) {
participants (2)
-
Charles Keepax -
Pierre-Louis Bossart