Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V4] ASoC/au1x: use resource_size for au1x
Hi mark,
How about this patch? Applied?
在 2010年6月1日 下午3:16,Wan ZongShun mcuos.com@gmail.com 写道:
Dear all,
Use the resource_size function instead of manually calculating the resource size.This patch can reduce the chance of introducing off-by-one errors.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShunmcuos.com@gmail.com
sound/soc/au1x/psc-ac97.c | 13 +++++-------- sound/soc/au1x/psc-i2s.c | 13 +++++-------- sound/soc/au1x/psc.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/au1x/psc-ac97.c b/sound/soc/au1x/psc-ac97.c index a61ccd2..d14a5a9 100644 --- a/sound/soc/au1x/psc-ac97.c +++ b/sound/soc/au1x/psc-ac97.c @@ -375,12 +375,10 @@ static int __devinit au1xpsc_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev) }
ret = -EBUSY;
- wd->ioarea = request_mem_region(r->start, r->end - r->start + 1,
- "au1xpsc_ac97");
- if (!wd->ioarea)
- if (!request_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r), pdev->name))
goto out0;
- wd->mmio = ioremap(r->start, 0xffff);
- wd->mmio = ioremap(r->start, resource_size(r));
if (!wd->mmio) goto out1;
@@ -410,8 +408,7 @@ static int __devinit au1xpsc_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
snd_soc_unregister_dai(&au1xpsc_ac97_dai); out1:
- release_resource(wd->ioarea);
- kfree(wd->ioarea);
- release_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r));
out0: kfree(wd); return ret; @@ -420,6 +417,7 @@ out0: static int __devexit au1xpsc_ac97_drvremove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct au1xpsc_audio_data *wd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (wd->dmapd) au1xpsc_pcm_destroy(wd->dmapd); @@ -433,8 +431,7 @@ static int __devexit au1xpsc_ac97_drvremove(struct platform_device *pdev) au_sync();
iounmap(wd->mmio);
- release_resource(wd->ioarea);
- kfree(wd->ioarea);
- release_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r));
kfree(wd);
au1xpsc_ac97_workdata = NULL; /* MDEV */ diff --git a/sound/soc/au1x/psc-i2s.c b/sound/soc/au1x/psc-i2s.c index 495be6e..737b238 100644 --- a/sound/soc/au1x/psc-i2s.c +++ b/sound/soc/au1x/psc-i2s.c @@ -321,12 +321,10 @@ static int __init au1xpsc_i2s_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev) }
ret = -EBUSY;
- wd->ioarea = request_mem_region(r->start, r->end - r->start + 1,
- "au1xpsc_i2s");
- if (!wd->ioarea)
- if (!request_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r), pdev->name))
goto out0;
- wd->mmio = ioremap(r->start, 0xffff);
- wd->mmio = ioremap(r->start, resource_size(r));
if (!wd->mmio) goto out1;
@@ -362,8 +360,7 @@ static int __init au1xpsc_i2s_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
snd_soc_unregister_dai(&au1xpsc_i2s_dai); out1:
- release_resource(wd->ioarea);
- kfree(wd->ioarea);
- release_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r));
out0: kfree(wd); return ret; @@ -372,6 +369,7 @@ out0: static int __devexit au1xpsc_i2s_drvremove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct au1xpsc_audio_data *wd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (wd->dmapd) au1xpsc_pcm_destroy(wd->dmapd); @@ -384,8 +382,7 @@ static int __devexit au1xpsc_i2s_drvremove(struct platform_device *pdev) au_sync();
iounmap(wd->mmio);
- release_resource(wd->ioarea);
- kfree(wd->ioarea);
- release_mem_region(r->start, resource_size(r));
kfree(wd);
au1xpsc_i2s_workdata = NULL; /* MDEV */ diff --git a/sound/soc/au1x/psc.h b/sound/soc/au1x/psc.h index 32d3807..093775d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/au1x/psc.h +++ b/sound/soc/au1x/psc.h @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct au1xpsc_audio_data { unsigned long rate;
unsigned long pm[2];
- struct resource *ioarea;
struct mutex lock; struct platform_device *dmapd; }; -- 1.6.3.3
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:48:27PM +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote:
How about this patch? Applied?
I was waiting for review from Manuel.
Oh, sorry.
Acked-by: Manuel Lauss manuel.lauss@googlemail.com
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:41:18PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:48:27PM +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote:
How about this patch? Applied?
I was waiting for review from Manuel.
Oh, sorry.
Acked-by: Manuel Lauss manuel.lauss@googlemail.com
Applied, thanks.
participants (3)
-
Manuel Lauss
-
Mark Brown
-
Wan ZongShun