[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Fix ruledata setup in davinci_mcasp_startup
Passing &mcasp->ruledata[dir] to snd_pcm_hw_rule_add() is not correct since commit: 7b3d165a2821 ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Index ruledata in drvdata with substream->stream now sets up the struct based on the substream->stream (0 or 1) while we pass a pointer which we take with dir (1 or 2). This will lead kernel crash.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com --- sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c index 0b6b1b286201..bb4b78eada58 100644 --- a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c +++ b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-mcasp.c @@ -1128,6 +1128,8 @@ static int davinci_mcasp_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai) { struct davinci_mcasp *mcasp = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai); + struct davinci_mcasp_ruledata *ruledata = + &mcasp->ruledata[substream->stream]; u32 max_channels = 0; int i, dir;
@@ -1149,7 +1151,7 @@ static int davinci_mcasp_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if (mcasp->serial_dir[i] == dir) max_channels++; } - mcasp->ruledata[substream->stream].serializers = max_channels; + ruledata->serializers = max_channels; max_channels *= mcasp->tdm_slots; /* * If the already active stream has less channels than the calculated @@ -1172,12 +1174,12 @@ static int davinci_mcasp_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, if (mcasp->bclk_master && mcasp->bclk_div == 0 && mcasp->sysclk_freq) { int ret;
- mcasp->ruledata[substream->stream].mcasp = mcasp; + ruledata->mcasp = mcasp;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, davinci_mcasp_hw_rule_rate, - &mcasp->ruledata[dir], + ruledata, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_FORMAT, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, -1); if (ret) @@ -1185,7 +1187,7 @@ static int davinci_mcasp_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, ret = snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_FORMAT, davinci_mcasp_hw_rule_format, - &mcasp->ruledata[dir], + ruledata, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, -1); if (ret) @@ -1193,7 +1195,7 @@ static int davinci_mcasp_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, ret = snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, davinci_mcasp_hw_rule_channels, - &mcasp->ruledata[dir], + ruledata, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_FORMAT, -1); if (ret)
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:03:53PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Passing &mcasp->ruledata[dir] to snd_pcm_hw_rule_add() is not correct since commit: 7b3d165a2821 ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Index ruledata in drvdata with substream->stream now sets up the struct based on the substream->stream (0 or 1) while we pass a pointer which we take with dir (1 or 2). This will lead kernel crash.
Applied, thanks.
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Peter Ujfalusi