[PATCH 2/3] ASoC: topology: use name_prefix for new kcontrol
Current topology doesn't add prefix of component to new kcontrol.
Signed-off-by: Gyeongtaek Lee gt82.lee@samsung.com --- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c index 575da6aba807..a152409e8746 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int soc_tplg_add_kcontrol(struct soc_tplg *tplg, struct snd_soc_component *comp = tplg->comp;
return soc_tplg_add_dcontrol(comp->card->snd_card, - comp->dev, k, NULL, comp, kcontrol); + comp->dev, k, comp->name_prefix, comp, kcontrol); }
/* remove a mixer kcontrol */
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:42:23AM +0900, �̰��� wrote:
Current topology doesn't add prefix of component to new kcontrol.
Please only number patches if you are sending them as part of a patch series, the purpose of numbering is to make sure that things get handled in the right order. Without a series it looks like there are some missing patches.
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:37:08AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:42:23AM +0900, �̰��� wrote:
Current topology doesn't add prefix of component to new kcontrol.
Please only number patches if you are sending them as part of a patch series, the purpose of numbering is to make sure that things get handled in the right order. Without a series it looks like there are some missing patches.
I'm trying to catch up the merge process now. Let me know if anything has gone wrong. I removed the patch number and re-sent the patch again.
Sorry and thank you for your review.
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
이경택