[PATCH] ASoC: rt5682: remove jack detect delay
There is a 250ms delay on the jack detect interrupt currently, this delay is observable to users who are using inline controls. It can also mask multiple presses which is a negative experience.
Cc: Bard liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Cc: Shuming Fan shumingf@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey cujomalainey@chromium.org --- sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c index 93c1603b42f1..b15c3e7d1f59 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rt5682_irq(int irq, void *data) struct rt5682_priv *rt5682 = data;
mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, - &rt5682->jack_detect_work, msecs_to_jiffies(250)); + &rt5682->jack_detect_work, 0);
return IRQ_HANDLED; }
Hello Realtek +Arava, Jairaj jairaj.arava@intel.com
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 1:49 PM Curtis Malainey cujomalainey@chromium.org wrote:
There is a 250ms delay on the jack detect interrupt currently, this delay is observable to users who are using inline controls. It can also mask multiple presses which is a negative experience.
Cc: Bard liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Cc: Shuming Fan shumingf@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey cujomalainey@chromium.org
sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c index 93c1603b42f1..b15c3e7d1f59 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-i2c.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rt5682_irq(int irq, void *data) struct rt5682_priv *rt5682 = data;
mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
&rt5682->jack_detect_work, msecs_to_jiffies(250));
&rt5682->jack_detect_work, 0);
This change is posted to start a discussion as to the purpose of this delay, we are seeing noticeable UI delay and button masking. Is there an electro/mechanical purpose to it? If not I think I should post a V2 to remove the workqueue since this is a threaded irq. Please advise, thanks.
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog
participants (2)
-
Curtis Malainey
-
Curtis Malainey