[PATCH RESEND] ASoC: codecs: es8316: Fix HW rate calculation for 48Mhz MCLK

For 48Mhz MCLK systems the calculation of the HW rate is broken, and will not produce even one sane rate. Since es83xx supports the option to halve MCLK, calculate also rates with MCLK/2.
Signed-off-by: Marian Postevca posteuca@mutex.one --- sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c b/sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c index 61729e5b50a8..f508df01145b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/es8316.c @@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ struct es8316_priv { struct snd_soc_jack *jack; int irq; unsigned int sysclk; - unsigned int allowed_rates[ARRAY_SIZE(supported_mclk_lrck_ratios)]; + /* ES83xx supports halving the MCLK so it supports twice as many rates + */ + unsigned int allowed_rates[ARRAY_SIZE(supported_mclk_lrck_ratios) * 2]; struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list sysclk_constraints; bool jd_inverted; }; @@ -386,6 +388,12 @@ static int es8316_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai,
if (freq % ratio == 0) es8316->allowed_rates[count++] = freq / ratio; + + /* We also check if the halved MCLK produces a valid rate + * since the codec supports halving the MCLK. + */ + if ((freq / ratio) % 2 == 0) + es8316->allowed_rates[count++] = freq / ratio / 2; }
if (count) {

On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 22:27:51 +0200, Marian Postevca wrote:
For 48Mhz MCLK systems the calculation of the HW rate is broken, and will not produce even one sane rate. Since es83xx supports the option to halve MCLK, calculate also rates with MCLK/2.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: codecs: es8316: Fix HW rate calculation for 48Mhz MCLK commit: 85c9ac7a56f731ecd59317c822cb6295464444cc
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Marian Postevca
-
Mark Brown