The newly added rt5659 codec driver unconditionally defines an ACPI device match table but then uses ACPI_PTR() to remove the only reference to it, so we get a harmless build warning:

sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c:4200:30: warning: 'rt5659_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] static struct acpi_device_id rt5659_acpi_match[] = {

This changes both the OF match table and the ACPI match table to follow the same style, using ACPI_PTR/of_match_ptr to make the reference conditional, and using an #ifdef to hide the table. This also adds the missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for the OF case and adapts the formatting to the same style.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de --- I still want to give this some time in the random build testing to avoid introducing a stupid mistake, please apply after tomorrow unless you hear from me otherwise.

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c index c166d9394c69..efe87af33f8f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c @@ -4183,24 +4183,29 @@ void rt5659_i2c_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client) regmap_write(rt5659->regmap, RT5659_RESET, 0); }

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF static const struct of_device_id rt5659_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "realtek,rt5658", }, { .compatible = "realtek,rt5659", }, - {}, + { }, }; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rt5659_of_match) +#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static struct acpi_device_id rt5659_acpi_match[] = { - { "10EC5658", 0}, - { "10EC5659", 0}, - { }, + { "10EC5658", 0, }, + { "10EC5659", 0, }, + { }, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, rt5659_acpi_match); +#endif

struct i2c_driver rt5659_i2c_driver = { .driver = { .name = "rt5659", .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .of_match_table = rt5659_of_match, + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(rt5659_of_match), .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(rt5659_acpi_match), }, .probe = rt5659_i2c_probe,