[PATCH] ASoC: ux500: mop500: Constify static snd_soc_ops
The struct mop500_ab8500_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops. Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com --- sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.c | 2 +- sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.c b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.c index 2c39c7a2fd7d..3e654e708f78 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.c +++ b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.c @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int mop500_ab8500_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) return 0; }
-struct snd_soc_ops mop500_ab8500_ops[] = { +const struct snd_soc_ops mop500_ab8500_ops[] = { { .hw_params = mop500_ab8500_hw_params, .hw_free = mop500_ab8500_hw_free, diff --git a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.h b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.h index 8138a4e9aaf5..087ef246d87d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.h +++ b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500_ab8500.h @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ #ifndef MOP500_AB8500_H #define MOP500_AB8500_H
-extern struct snd_soc_ops mop500_ab8500_ops[]; +extern const struct snd_soc_ops mop500_ab8500_ops[];
int mop500_ab8500_machine_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); void mop500_ab8500_remove(struct snd_soc_card *card);
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:44:01 +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
The struct mop500_ab8500_ops is only assigned to the ops field in the snd_soc_dai_link struct which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops. Make it const to allow the compiler to put it in read-only memory.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: ux500: mop500: Constify static snd_soc_ops commit: 2831b71917264d7000855657acb1953003d3fd2d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
participants (2)
-
Mark Brown
-
Rikard Falkeborn