[PATCH 0/4] soundwire: allow for more than 8 devices, keep IDA for wake-capable devices
This series suggests a hybrid strategy for device number allocation, where only wake-capable devices use a system-unique Device Number which will be used on LunarLake to handle wake-ups using the HDaudio WAKEEN and WAKESTS.
Pierre-Louis Bossart (4): soundwire: add enum to control device number allocation soundwire: introduce SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY soundwire: extend parameters of new_peripheral_assigned() callback soundwire: intel_auxdevice: use SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Commit c60561014257 ("soundwire: bus: allow device number to be unique at system level") introduced two strategies to allocate device numbers.
a) a default unconstrained allocation, where each bus can allocate Device Numbers independently.
b) an ida-based allocation. In this case each Device Number will be unique at the system-level.
The IDA-based allocation is useful to simplify debug, but it was also introduced as a prerequisite to deal with the Intel Lunar Lake hardware programming sequences: the wake-ups have to be handled with a system-unique SDI address at the HDaudio controller level.
At the time, the restriction introduced by the IDA to 8 devices total seemed perfectly fine, but recently hardware vendors created configurations with more than 8 devices.
This patch provides an iso-functionality change, with the allocation selected with an enum instead of an 'ida_min' value. Follow-up patches will add a new allocation strategy to allow for more than 8 devices using information on the type of devices, and only use the IDA-based allocation for devices capable of generating a wake.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com --- drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 4 ++-- drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 1 + include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 16 +++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index b44f8d0affa6..e8c1c55a2a73 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (slave->dev_num) { /* clear dev_num if assigned */ clear_bit(slave->dev_num, bus->assigned); - if (bus->dev_num_ida_min) + if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) ida_free(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->dev_num); } list_del_init(&slave->node); @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int sdw_get_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) { int bit;
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min) { + if (slave->bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) { bit = ida_alloc_range(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL); diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c index 0daa6ca9a224..30f3d2ab80fd 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static int intel_link_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, cdns->msg_count = 0;
bus->link_id = auxdev->id; + bus->dev_num_alloc = SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA; bus->dev_num_ida_min = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN; bus->clk_stop_timeout = 1;
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index c076a3f879b3..4656d6d0f3bb 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -864,6 +864,17 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num); };
+/** + * enum sdw_dev_num_alloc - Device Number allocation strategies + * @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation, + * using range [1, 11] + * @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11] + */ +enum sdw_dev_num_alloc { + SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0, + SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA, +}; + /** * struct sdw_bus - SoundWire bus * @dev: Shortcut to &bus->md->dev to avoid changing the entire code. @@ -895,9 +906,11 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { * meaningful if multi_link is set. If set to 1, hardware-based * synchronization will be used even if a stream only uses a single * SoundWire segment. + * @dev_num_alloc: bus-specific device number allocation * @dev_num_ida_min: if set, defines the minimum values for the IDA * used to allocate system-unique device numbers. This value needs to be - * identical across all SoundWire bus in the system. + * identical across all SoundWire bus in the system. Only used if @sdw_num_alloc + * is not default. */ struct sdw_bus { struct device *dev; @@ -922,6 +935,7 @@ struct sdw_bus { u32 bank_switch_timeout; bool multi_link; int hw_sync_min_links; + enum sdw_dev_num_alloc dev_num_alloc; int dev_num_ida_min; };
On 31-05-23, 11:37, Bard Liao wrote:
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Commit c60561014257 ("soundwire: bus: allow device number to be unique at system level") introduced two strategies to allocate device numbers.
a) a default unconstrained allocation, where each bus can allocate Device Numbers independently.
b) an ida-based allocation. In this case each Device Number will be unique at the system-level.
The IDA-based allocation is useful to simplify debug, but it was also introduced as a prerequisite to deal with the Intel Lunar Lake hardware programming sequences: the wake-ups have to be handled with a system-unique SDI address at the HDaudio controller level.
At the time, the restriction introduced by the IDA to 8 devices total seemed perfectly fine, but recently hardware vendors created configurations with more than 8 devices.
This patch provides an iso-functionality change, with the allocation selected with an enum instead of an 'ida_min' value. Follow-up patches will add a new allocation strategy to allow for more than 8 devices using information on the type of devices, and only use the IDA-based allocation for devices capable of generating a wake.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 4 ++-- drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 1 + include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 16 +++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index b44f8d0affa6..e8c1c55a2a73 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (slave->dev_num) { /* clear dev_num if assigned */ clear_bit(slave->dev_num, bus->assigned);
if (bus->dev_num_ida_min)
} list_del_init(&slave->node);if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) ida_free(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->dev_num);
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int sdw_get_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) { int bit;
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min) {
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) { bit = ida_alloc_range(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c index 0daa6ca9a224..30f3d2ab80fd 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static int intel_link_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, cdns->msg_count = 0;
bus->link_id = auxdev->id;
- bus->dev_num_alloc = SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA; bus->dev_num_ida_min = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN; bus->clk_stop_timeout = 1;
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index c076a3f879b3..4656d6d0f3bb 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -864,6 +864,17 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num); };
+/**
- enum sdw_dev_num_alloc - Device Number allocation strategies
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation,
- using range [1, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11]
- */
+enum sdw_dev_num_alloc {
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0,
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA,
Let default be IDA as 0, am sure we are not setting this field in qcom or amd controller, lets retain the defaults please
+};
/**
- struct sdw_bus - SoundWire bus
- @dev: Shortcut to &bus->md->dev to avoid changing the entire code.
@@ -895,9 +906,11 @@ struct sdw_master_ops {
- meaningful if multi_link is set. If set to 1, hardware-based
- synchronization will be used even if a stream only uses a single
- SoundWire segment.
- @dev_num_alloc: bus-specific device number allocation
- @dev_num_ida_min: if set, defines the minimum values for the IDA
- used to allocate system-unique device numbers. This value needs to be
- identical across all SoundWire bus in the system.
- identical across all SoundWire bus in the system. Only used if @sdw_num_alloc
*/
- is not default.
struct sdw_bus { struct device *dev; @@ -922,6 +935,7 @@ struct sdw_bus { u32 bank_switch_timeout; bool multi_link; int hw_sync_min_links;
- enum sdw_dev_num_alloc dev_num_alloc; int dev_num_ida_min;
};
-- 2.25.1
+/**
- enum sdw_dev_num_alloc - Device Number allocation strategies
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation,
- using range [1, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11]
- */
+enum sdw_dev_num_alloc {
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0,
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA,
Let default be IDA as 0, am sure we are not setting this field in qcom or amd controller, lets retain the defaults please
Not following, QCOM or AMD are NOT using the IDA-based version, so the default is zero.
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
This patch adds a new Device Number allocation strategy, with the IDA used only for devices that are wake-capable.
"regular" devices such as amplifiers will use Device Numbers [1..min_ida-1].
"wake-capable" devices such as jack or microphone codecs will use Device Numbers [min_ida..11].
This hybrid strategy extends the number of supported devices in a system by only constraining the allocation if required, e.g. in the case of Intel LunarLake platforms the wake-capable devices are required to have a unique address to use the HDaudio SDI and HDAudio WAKEEN/WAKESTS registers.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com --- drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index e8c1c55a2a73..6f465cce8369 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (slave->dev_num) { /* clear dev_num if assigned */ clear_bit(slave->dev_num, bus->assigned); - if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) + if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA || + (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY && + slave->prop.wake_capable)) ida_free(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->dev_num); } list_del_init(&slave->node); @@ -699,17 +701,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_compare_devid); /* called with bus_lock held */ static int sdw_get_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) { + struct sdw_bus *bus = slave->bus; int bit;
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) { + if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA || + (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY && + slave->prop.wake_capable)) { bit = ida_alloc_range(&sdw_peripheral_ida, - slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, + bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL); if (bit < 0) goto err; } else { - bit = find_first_zero_bit(slave->bus->assigned, SDW_MAX_DEVICES); - if (bit == SDW_MAX_DEVICES) { + int max_devices = SDW_MAX_DEVICES; + + if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY && + !slave->prop.wake_capable) { + max_devices = bus->dev_num_ida_min - 1; + + /* range check */ + if (max_devices < 1 || max_devices > SDW_MAX_DEVICES) + return -EINVAL; + } + + bit = find_first_zero_bit(bus->assigned, max_devices); + if (bit == max_devices) { bit = -ENODEV; goto err; } diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 4656d6d0f3bb..8a7541ac735e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -869,10 +869,14 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { * @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation, * using range [1, 11] * @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11] + * @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY: Hybrid allocation where wake-capable devices rely on + * IDA-based allocation and range [ida_min, 11], while regular devices rely on default + * allocation in range [1, ida_min - 1] */ enum sdw_dev_num_alloc { SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0, SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA, + SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY, };
/**
On 31-05-23, 11:37, Bard Liao wrote:
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
This patch adds a new Device Number allocation strategy, with the IDA used only for devices that are wake-capable.
"regular" devices such as amplifiers will use Device Numbers [1..min_ida-1].
"wake-capable" devices such as jack or microphone codecs will use Device Numbers [min_ida..11].
This hybrid strategy extends the number of supported devices in a system by only constraining the allocation if required, e.g. in the case of Intel LunarLake platforms the wake-capable devices are required to have a unique address to use the HDaudio SDI and HDAudio WAKEEN/WAKESTS registers.
This seems to be a consequence of Intel hardware decisions, so I guess best suited place for this is Intel controller, do we really want to have this in core logic?
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index e8c1c55a2a73..6f465cce8369 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (slave->dev_num) { /* clear dev_num if assigned */ clear_bit(slave->dev_num, bus->assigned);
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA)
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA ||
(bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
} list_del_init(&slave->node);slave->prop.wake_capable)) ida_free(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->dev_num);
@@ -699,17 +701,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_compare_devid); /* called with bus_lock held */ static int sdw_get_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) {
- struct sdw_bus *bus = slave->bus; int bit;
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) {
- if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA ||
(bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
bit = ida_alloc_range(&sdw_peripheral_ida,slave->prop.wake_capable)) {
slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES,
if (bit < 0) goto err; } else {bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL);
bit = find_first_zero_bit(slave->bus->assigned, SDW_MAX_DEVICES);
if (bit == SDW_MAX_DEVICES) {
int max_devices = SDW_MAX_DEVICES;
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
!slave->prop.wake_capable) {
max_devices = bus->dev_num_ida_min - 1;
/* range check */
if (max_devices < 1 || max_devices > SDW_MAX_DEVICES)
return -EINVAL;
}
bit = find_first_zero_bit(bus->assigned, max_devices);
}if (bit == max_devices) { bit = -ENODEV; goto err;
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 4656d6d0f3bb..8a7541ac735e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -869,10 +869,14 @@ struct sdw_master_ops {
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation,
- using range [1, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY: Hybrid allocation where wake-capable devices rely on
- IDA-based allocation and range [ida_min, 11], while regular devices rely on default
*/
- allocation in range [1, ida_min - 1]
enum sdw_dev_num_alloc { SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0, SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA,
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY,
};
/**
2.25.1
On 6/8/23 02:06, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 31-05-23, 11:37, Bard Liao wrote:
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
This patch adds a new Device Number allocation strategy, with the IDA used only for devices that are wake-capable.
"regular" devices such as amplifiers will use Device Numbers [1..min_ida-1].
"wake-capable" devices such as jack or microphone codecs will use Device Numbers [min_ida..11].
This hybrid strategy extends the number of supported devices in a system by only constraining the allocation if required, e.g. in the case of Intel LunarLake platforms the wake-capable devices are required to have a unique address to use the HDaudio SDI and HDAudio WAKEEN/WAKESTS registers.
This seems to be a consequence of Intel hardware decisions, so I guess best suited place for this is Intel controller, do we really want to have this in core logic?
It's a valid objection.
The reason why I added the alternate strategies in the core logic is that the IDA and hybrid approach are just software-based with no specific hardware dependencies. If QCOM or AMD wanted to use the strategies contributed and tested by Intel, it'd be a two-line change on their side.
That said, it's likely that at some point *someone* will want to constrain the device number allocation further, be it with ACPI/DT properties or reading hardware registers. The device number is a de-facto priority given the way we scan the PING frames, so some systems may want to give a higher priority to a specific peripherals.
This would push us to add a master ops callback to control the device number allocation. It's a bit invasive but that would give the ultimate flexibility. Reuse between vendors could be possible if 'generic' callbacks were part of a library to pick from.
I don't really have any objections if this vendor-specific callback was preferred, it may be a bit early to add this but long-term it's probably what makes more sense.
I'll go with the flow on suggested recommendations.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index e8c1c55a2a73..6f465cce8369 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ static int sdw_delete_slave(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (slave->dev_num) { /* clear dev_num if assigned */ clear_bit(slave->dev_num, bus->assigned);
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA)
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA ||
(bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
} list_del_init(&slave->node);slave->prop.wake_capable)) ida_free(&sdw_peripheral_ida, slave->dev_num);
@@ -699,17 +701,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_compare_devid); /* called with bus_lock held */ static int sdw_get_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) {
- struct sdw_bus *bus = slave->bus; int bit;
- if (slave->bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) {
- if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA ||
(bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
bit = ida_alloc_range(&sdw_peripheral_ida,slave->prop.wake_capable)) {
slave->bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES,
if (bit < 0) goto err; } else {bus->dev_num_ida_min, SDW_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL);
bit = find_first_zero_bit(slave->bus->assigned, SDW_MAX_DEVICES);
if (bit == SDW_MAX_DEVICES) {
int max_devices = SDW_MAX_DEVICES;
if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY &&
!slave->prop.wake_capable) {
max_devices = bus->dev_num_ida_min - 1;
/* range check */
if (max_devices < 1 || max_devices > SDW_MAX_DEVICES)
return -EINVAL;
}
bit = find_first_zero_bit(bus->assigned, max_devices);
}if (bit == max_devices) { bit = -ENODEV; goto err;
diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 4656d6d0f3bb..8a7541ac735e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -869,10 +869,14 @@ struct sdw_master_ops {
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT: unconstrained first-come-first-serve allocation,
- using range [1, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA: IDA-based allocation, using range [ida_min, 11]
- @SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY: Hybrid allocation where wake-capable devices rely on
- IDA-based allocation and range [ida_min, 11], while regular devices rely on default
*/
- allocation in range [1, ida_min - 1]
enum sdw_dev_num_alloc { SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_DEFAULT = 0, SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA,
- SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY,
};
/**
2.25.1
On 08-06-23, 10:09, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 6/8/23 02:06, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 31-05-23, 11:37, Bard Liao wrote:
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
This patch adds a new Device Number allocation strategy, with the IDA used only for devices that are wake-capable.
"regular" devices such as amplifiers will use Device Numbers [1..min_ida-1].
"wake-capable" devices such as jack or microphone codecs will use Device Numbers [min_ida..11].
This hybrid strategy extends the number of supported devices in a system by only constraining the allocation if required, e.g. in the case of Intel LunarLake platforms the wake-capable devices are required to have a unique address to use the HDaudio SDI and HDAudio WAKEEN/WAKESTS registers.
This seems to be a consequence of Intel hardware decisions, so I guess best suited place for this is Intel controller, do we really want to have this in core logic?
It's a valid objection.
The reason why I added the alternate strategies in the core logic is that the IDA and hybrid approach are just software-based with no specific hardware dependencies. If QCOM or AMD wanted to use the strategies contributed and tested by Intel, it'd be a two-line change on their side.
That said, it's likely that at some point *someone* will want to constrain the device number allocation further, be it with ACPI/DT properties or reading hardware registers. The device number is a de-facto priority given the way we scan the PING frames, so some systems may want to give a higher priority to a specific peripherals.
This would push us to add a master ops callback to control the device number allocation. It's a bit invasive but that would give the ultimate flexibility. Reuse between vendors could be possible if 'generic' callbacks were part of a library to pick from.
I don't really have any objections if this vendor-specific callback was preferred, it may be a bit early to add this but long-term it's probably what makes more sense.
I'll go with the flow on suggested recommendations.
Thanks, if it all one of the other two controller start using this, it would make sense to move it to core then, for now would be better to have this in specific driver
This seems to be a consequence of Intel hardware decisions, so I guess best suited place for this is Intel controller, do we really want to have this in core logic?
It's a valid objection.
The reason why I added the alternate strategies in the core logic is that the IDA and hybrid approach are just software-based with no specific hardware dependencies. If QCOM or AMD wanted to use the strategies contributed and tested by Intel, it'd be a two-line change on their side.
That said, it's likely that at some point *someone* will want to constrain the device number allocation further, be it with ACPI/DT properties or reading hardware registers. The device number is a de-facto priority given the way we scan the PING frames, so some systems may want to give a higher priority to a specific peripherals.
This would push us to add a master ops callback to control the device number allocation. It's a bit invasive but that would give the ultimate flexibility. Reuse between vendors could be possible if 'generic' callbacks were part of a library to pick from.
I don't really have any objections if this vendor-specific callback was preferred, it may be a bit early to add this but long-term it's probably what makes more sense.
I'll go with the flow on suggested recommendations.
Thanks, if it all one of the other two controller start using this, it would make sense to move it to core then, for now would be better to have this in specific driver
The code is much cleaner indeed that way.
I still have to work on a race condition if the codec driver probe happens *after* the enumeration. In that case, the properties needed to decide which allocation to use are not initialized yet.
We may need to either force the codec to re-enumerate with a ForceReset, or to switch the device number. In theory the latter is straightforward but there can be additional races if there are interrupts thrown just before the device number change happens.
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
The parameters are only the bus and the device number, manager ops may need additional details on the type of peripheral connected, such as whether it is wake-capable or not.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com --- drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 2 +- drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 4 +++- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index 6f465cce8369..17b9a8bdf234 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int sdw_assign_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) slave->dev_num = slave->dev_num_sticky;
if (bus->ops && bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned) - bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned(bus, dev_num); + bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned(bus, slave, dev_num);
return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c index 30f3d2ab80fd..c1df6f014e6b 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ static int generic_post_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus) return sdw->link_res->hw_ops->post_bank_switch(sdw); }
-static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num) +static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, + struct sdw_slave *slave, + int dev_num) { struct sdw_cdns *cdns = bus_to_cdns(bus); struct sdw_intel *sdw = cdns_to_intel(cdns); diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 8a7541ac735e..41a856bedf1e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -861,7 +861,9 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { int (*pre_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); int (*post_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); u32 (*read_ping_status)(struct sdw_bus *bus); - void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num); + void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, + struct sdw_slave *slave, + int dev_num); };
/**
On 31-05-23, 11:37, Bard Liao wrote:
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
The parameters are only the bus and the device number, manager ops may need additional details on the type of peripheral connected, such as whether it is wake-capable or not.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 2 +- drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 4 +++- include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index 6f465cce8369..17b9a8bdf234 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int sdw_assign_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) slave->dev_num = slave->dev_num_sticky;
if (bus->ops && bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned)
bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned(bus, dev_num);
bus->ops->new_peripheral_assigned(bus, slave, dev_num);
return 0;
} diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c index 30f3d2ab80fd..c1df6f014e6b 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ static int generic_post_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus) return sdw->link_res->hw_ops->post_bank_switch(sdw); }
-static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num) +static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
int dev_num)
{ struct sdw_cdns *cdns = bus_to_cdns(bus); struct sdw_intel *sdw = cdns_to_intel(cdns); diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 8a7541ac735e..41a856bedf1e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -861,7 +861,9 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { int (*pre_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); int (*post_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); u32 (*read_ping_status)(struct sdw_bus *bus);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
maybe better, drop the bus and pass slave (which contains bus)
-static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num) +static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
int dev_num)
{ struct sdw_cdns *cdns = bus_to_cdns(bus); struct sdw_intel *sdw = cdns_to_intel(cdns); diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 8a7541ac735e..41a856bedf1e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -861,7 +861,9 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { int (*pre_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); int (*post_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); u32 (*read_ping_status)(struct sdw_bus *bus);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
maybe better, drop the bus and pass slave (which contains bus)
I kept it for consistency, all callbacks for sdw_master_ops start with the bus parameter.
On 08-06-23, 08:24, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
-static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num) +static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
int dev_num)
{ struct sdw_cdns *cdns = bus_to_cdns(bus); struct sdw_intel *sdw = cdns_to_intel(cdns); diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h index 8a7541ac735e..41a856bedf1e 100644 --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h @@ -861,7 +861,9 @@ struct sdw_master_ops { int (*pre_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); int (*post_bank_switch)(struct sdw_bus *bus); u32 (*read_ping_status)(struct sdw_bus *bus);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus, int dev_num);
- void (*new_peripheral_assigned)(struct sdw_bus *bus,
struct sdw_slave *slave,
maybe better, drop the bus and pass slave (which contains bus)
I kept it for consistency, all callbacks for sdw_master_ops start with the bus parameter.
That is a valid point, since this is sdw_master_ops() and not slave, this looks better
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Change the allocation strategy on Intel platforms to use Device Numbers
[1..5]: unconstrained allocation with bus-specific Device Numbers, typically for amplifiers.
[6..11]: IDA-based system-unique Device Number to be used for wake-capable devices such as jack codecs or microphone codecs.
These values were chosen based on the typical maximum number of devices per link given electrical/PHY limitations. This configuration will e.g. allow for 8 amplifiers on 2 links, and additional devices on the remaining links.
Example on Dell SDCA device with jack codec, two amplifiers and one microphone codec: only the jack codec relies on the IDA, others use the same Device Number 1 on separate links.
rt711-sdca sdw:0:025d:0711:01: signaling enumeration completion for Slave 6 rt1316-sdca sdw:1:025d:1316:01: signaling enumeration completion for Slave 1 rt1316-sdca sdw:2:025d:1316:01: signaling enumeration completion for Slave 1 rt715-sdca sdw:3:025d:0714:01: signaling enumeration completion for Slave 1
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rander Wang rander.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Bard Liao yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com --- drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c index c1df6f014e6b..917edc75ddfb 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel_auxdevice.c @@ -23,8 +23,12 @@ #include "intel.h" #include "intel_auxdevice.h"
-/* IDA min selected to avoid conflicts with HDaudio/iDISP SDI values */ -#define INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN 4 +/* + * IDA min selected to allow for 5 unconstrained devices per link, + * and 6 system-unique Device Numbers for wake-capable devices. + */ + +#define INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN 6
#define INTEL_MASTER_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS 3000
@@ -66,9 +70,20 @@ static void generic_new_peripheral_assigned(struct sdw_bus *bus, { struct sdw_cdns *cdns = bus_to_cdns(bus); struct sdw_intel *sdw = cdns_to_intel(cdns); + int min_dev = 1; + int max_dev = SDW_MAX_DEVICES; + + if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA) { + min_dev = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN; + } else if (bus->dev_num_alloc == SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY) { + if (slave->prop.wake_capable) + min_dev = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN; + else + max_dev = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN - 1; + }
/* paranoia check, this should never happen */ - if (dev_num < INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN || dev_num > SDW_MAX_DEVICES) { + if (dev_num < min_dev || dev_num > max_dev) { dev_err(bus->dev, "%s: invalid dev_num %d\n", __func__, dev_num); return; } @@ -167,7 +182,7 @@ static int intel_link_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, cdns->msg_count = 0;
bus->link_id = auxdev->id; - bus->dev_num_alloc = SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA; + bus->dev_num_alloc = SDW_DEV_NUM_ALLOC_IDA_WAKE_ONLY; bus->dev_num_ida_min = INTEL_DEV_NUM_IDA_MIN; bus->clk_stop_timeout = 1;
participants (3)
-
Bard Liao
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart
-
Vinod Koul