[alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix unused-const-variable warning
Last year, unused static const variable was added, then compiler generates a below warning.
dapm.c:43:30: warning: ‘widget_control_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This commit removes it.
Fixes: 01a0e1a1c219 ("topology: Add DAPM object parser") Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp --- src/topology/dapm.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/topology/dapm.c b/src/topology/dapm.c index e830751..8c585a7 100644 --- a/src/topology/dapm.c +++ b/src/topology/dapm.c @@ -39,14 +39,6 @@ static const struct map_elem widget_map[] = { {"dai_link", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_DAI_LINK}, };
-/* mapping of widget kcontrol text names to types */ -static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = { - {"volsw", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_VOLSW}, - {"enum_double", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_DOUBLE}, - {"enum_virt", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VIRT}, - {"enum_value", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VALUE}, -}; - static int lookup_widget(const char *w) { unsigned int i;
Ping to Liam. I wish this patch would be included to next release of this library.
On 2016年11月30日 00:44, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Last year, unused static const variable was added, then compiler generates a below warning.
dapm.c:43:30: warning: ‘widget_control_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This commit removes it.
Fixes: 01a0e1a1c219 ("topology: Add DAPM object parser") Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp
src/topology/dapm.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/topology/dapm.c b/src/topology/dapm.c index e830751..8c585a7 100644 --- a/src/topology/dapm.c +++ b/src/topology/dapm.c @@ -39,14 +39,6 @@ static const struct map_elem widget_map[] = { {"dai_link", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_DAI_LINK}, };
-/* mapping of widget kcontrol text names to types */ -static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = {
- {"volsw", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_VOLSW},
- {"enum_double", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_DOUBLE},
- {"enum_virt", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VIRT},
- {"enum_value", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VALUE},
-};
static int lookup_widget(const char *w) { unsigned int i;
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:39 +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Ping to Liam. I wish this patch would be included to next release of this library.
On 2016年11月30日 00:44, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Last year, unused static const variable was added, then compiler generates a below warning.
dapm.c:43:30: warning: ‘widget_control_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This commit removes it.
Fixes: 01a0e1a1c219 ("topology: Add DAPM object parser") Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp
src/topology/dapm.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/topology/dapm.c b/src/topology/dapm.c index e830751..8c585a7 100644 --- a/src/topology/dapm.c +++ b/src/topology/dapm.c @@ -39,14 +39,6 @@ static const struct map_elem widget_map[] = { {"dai_link", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_DAI_LINK}, };
-/* mapping of widget kcontrol text names to types */ -static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = {
- {"volsw", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_VOLSW},
- {"enum_double", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_DOUBLE},
- {"enum_virt", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VIRT},
- {"enum_value", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VALUE},
-};
static int lookup_widget(const char *w) { unsigned int i;
-----Original Message----- From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:alsa-devel- bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 4:49 PM
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Thanks Mengdong
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:39 +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Ping to Liam. I wish this patch would be included to next release of this library.
On 2016年11月30日 00:44, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
Last year, unused static const variable was added, then compiler generates a below warning.
dapm.c:43:30: warning: ‘widget_control_map’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] static const struct map_elem
widget_control_map[] = {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~This commit removes it.
Fixes: 01a0e1a1c219 ("topology: Add DAPM object parser") Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp
src/topology/dapm.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/topology/dapm.c b/src/topology/dapm.c index e830751..8c585a7 100644 --- a/src/topology/dapm.c +++ b/src/topology/dapm.c @@ -39,14 +39,6 @@ static const struct map_elem widget_map[] = { {"dai_link", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_DAI_LINK}, };
-/* mapping of widget kcontrol text names to types */ -static const struct map_elem widget_control_map[] = {
- {"volsw", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_VOLSW},
- {"enum_double", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_DOUBLE},
- {"enum_virt", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VIRT},
- {"enum_value", SND_SOC_TPLG_DAPM_CTL_ENUM_VALUE},
-};
static int lookup_widget(const char *w) { unsigned int i;
Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
On 2016年12月23日 23:48, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:alsa-devel- bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 4:49 PM
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Additionally, would you check this post to fix some warnings which you added into alsa-lib, please. [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object() http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115896.ht...
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 00:08 +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On 2016年12月23日 23:48, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:alsa-devel- bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 4:49 PM
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Additionally, would you check this post to fix some warnings which you added into alsa-lib, please. [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object() http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115896.ht...
Both look good to me. Apologies that I missed them.
You may want to resend them both with my Ack (maybe wait for until after Christmas though).
Thanks
Liam
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto
On 2016年12月24日 00:23, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 00:08 +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On 2016年12月23日 23:48, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:alsa-devel- bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 4:49 PM
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Additionally, would you check this post to fix some warnings which you added into alsa-lib, please. [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object() http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115896.ht...
Both look good to me. Apologies that I missed them.
You may want to resend them both with my Ack (maybe wait for until after Christmas though).
No need. Iwai-san already reviewed them. Next year, I'll request him to apply them. http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115725.ht...
I request Mengdong-Lin to care of compiler warnings again. Her patches frequently bring this kind of mistakes, and I have no motivations to fix them anymore.
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto
-----Original Message----- From: Takashi Sakamoto [mailto:o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:34 PM
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from
controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Additionally, would you check this post to fix some warnings which you added into alsa-lib, please. [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object() http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/11 5896.html
Both look good to me. Apologies that I missed them.
You may want to resend them both with my Ack (maybe wait for until after Christmas though).
No need. Iwai-san already reviewed them. Next year, I'll request him to apply them. http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016- December/115725.html
I request Mengdong-Lin to care of compiler warnings again. Her patches frequently bring this kind of mistakes, and I have no motivations to fix them anymore.
Sorry for this. I'll be careful on the warnings.
To avoid the same issue for UCM, I submitted patches to add '-Wall' to the AM_CPPFLAGS for topology, so we can always see the warnings and fix them. If this is acceptable for ucm, I'll also enable all warnings for topology as well.
Thanks Mengdong
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:34:29 +0100, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On 2016年12月24日 00:23, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 00:08 +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
On 2016年12月23日 23:48, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org [mailto:alsa-devel- bounces@alsa-project.org] On Behalf Of Liam Girdwood Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 4:49 PM
This looks fine by me, Mengdong is this still unused or is it needed by a future patch ?
Hi Liam,
This "widget_control_map" is still unused now.
Could you remember why we define this map in the early phase? I guess previously we want to distinguish stand-alone controls from controls embedded in widgets. But now we process them in the same way, both in user space and kernel.
So I feel we can remove this structure.
Additionally, would you check this post to fix some warnings which you added into alsa-lib, please. [alsa-devel] [PATCH][alsa-lib] topology: fix sign-compare warning introduced to set_link_hw_config() and tplg_add_link_object() http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115896.ht...
Both look good to me. Apologies that I missed them.
You may want to resend them both with my Ack (maybe wait for until after Christmas though).
No need. Iwai-san already reviewed them. Next year, I'll request him to apply them. http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December/115725.ht...
I applied this one now. Thanks.
Takashi
participants (4)
-
Liam Girdwood -
Lin, Mengdong -
Takashi Iwai -
Takashi Sakamoto