On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:48:34AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

On 09/18/2013 09:46 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

...

How about moving these to optional instead of removing them completely (or just leaving them alone)? That way if the driver does want to start using them people will have hooked them up already so no updates will be required.

the definitions as they stand now make no sense as the ordering of the interrupts are undefined - example is the first index RX or TX? the alternative will be PIO McASP driver, which might be nice, but having a vague binding with 0 code behind is of no use for anyone right?

So the sensible fix seems to be to specify the order rather than remove them then...