Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps
On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon boris.brezillon@bootlin.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200 Robert Jarzmik robert.jarzmik@free.fr wrote:
Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org writes:
On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik robert.jarzmik@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree either an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next iterations of this serie.
Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you receive the needed acks of course.
For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all
Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-), but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.
Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more people have been having fun about it (me too). :-)
Kind regards Uffe
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon boris.brezillon@bootlin.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200 Robert Jarzmik robert.jarzmik@free.fr wrote:
Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org writes:
On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik robert.jarzmik@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code. As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree either an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next iterations of this serie.
Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you receive the needed acks of course.
For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all
Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-), but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.
Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more people have been having fun about it (me too). :-)
I occasionally still type 2.6.17 when I mean 4.17.
Arnd
participants (2)
-
Arnd Bergmann
-
Ulf Hansson