Re: [alsa-devel] Can someone verify support for "AzTech Sound Galaxy Nova 16 Extra II-3D - using AZT-2316/R Chipset - FCC-ID:I38-MMSN846" ?
Yes, its like you said Rene, sb8 works although the sound is distorted and the module can't be removed... Later I can modprobe sgalaxy too, and the sound works without a hitch.
Also since now I can compile some code - your "eeprom.c" compiles and works - I'm available for further testing... I also noticed that the binary you sent was 506kb while my compilation is 9kb, maybe you sent an early/later version with some additional includes for verbose ? I compiled it with "gcc -W -Wall -o eeprom eeprom.c" like you said (on my xubuntu 7.04 with build-essentials deb package installed). See attachment...
Ram Kromberg ramkromberg@mail.com
On 05/17/2007 10:48 AM, ramkromberg@mail.com wrote:
Yes, its like you said Rene, sb8 works although the sound is distorted and the module can't be removed... Later I can modprobe sgalaxy too, and the sound works without a hitch.
Okay, don't know what the trouble is with that distortion (if you haven't set the volumes to 100, that is) but not too important right now.
Also since now I can compile some code - your "eeprom.c" compiles and works - I'm available for further testing...
I might want you to test some mode-resetting code later; will be sure to ask if needed.
I also noticed that the binary you sent was 506kb while my compilation is 9kb, maybe you sent an early/later version with some additional includes for verbose ? I compiled it with "gcc -W -Wall -o eeprom eeprom.c" like you said (on my xubuntu 7.04 with build-essentials deb package installed).
Now try it with "gcc -static -W -Wall -o eeprom eeprom.c". I compiled the binary I provided with that "-static" flag which means the program includes all library code directly inside the binary and doesn't link to the library code you already have on your system.
I did this to avoid any version problems that may exist between different distributions. Essentially you're only guaranteed that a dynamic executable will work on the system on which it was compiled (rather, on a system with the same versions of the libraries installed as on the system on which it was compiled). In this case the program only links to the system C library and did nothing weird so it wasn't much of an issue, but I don't even want to deal with any _possible_ problems of that nature...
Yes, with a normal (ie, dynamic) link that 9k is correct.
Rene.
participants (2)
-
ramkromberg@mail.com
-
Rene Herman