I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/rme32.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/rme32.c b/sound/pci/rme32.c index cd94ac5..c932c09 100644 --- a/sound/pci/rme32.c +++ b/sound/pci/rme32.c @@ -91,13 +91,13 @@ static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR; /* ID for this card */ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; /* Enable this card */ static bool fullduplex[SNDRV_CARDS]; // = {[0 ... (SNDRV_CARDS - 1)] = 1};

-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for RME Digi32 soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for RME Digi32 soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable RME Digi32 soundcard."); -module_param_array(fullduplex, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(fullduplex, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(fullduplex, "Support full-duplex mode."); MODULE_AUTHOR("Martin Langer martin-langer@gmx.de, Pilo Chambert pilo.c@wanadoo.fr"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RME Digi32, Digi32/8, Digi32 PRO");