I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- sound/pci/ali5451/ali5451.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/ali5451/ali5451.c b/sound/pci/ali5451/ali5451.c index 36470af..8b8811c 100644 --- a/sound/pci/ali5451/ali5451.c +++ b/sound/pci/ali5451/ali5451.c @@ -50,18 +50,18 @@ static char *id = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR1; /* ID for this card */ static int pcm_channels = 32; static bool spdif;

-module_param(index, int, 0444); +module_param(index, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for ALI M5451 PCI Audio."); -module_param(id, charp, 0444); +module_param(id, charp, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for ALI M5451 PCI Audio."); -module_param(pcm_channels, int, 0444); +module_param(pcm_channels, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(pcm_channels, "PCM Channels"); -module_param(spdif, bool, 0444); +module_param(spdif, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(spdif, "Support SPDIF I/O");

/* just for backward compatibility */ static bool enable; -module_param(enable, bool, 0444); +module_param(enable, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);

/*