In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com --- sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c b/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c index 46c292b..71776bf 100644 --- a/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c +++ b/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ irqreturn_t snd_mixart_threaded_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) dev_err(&mgr->pci->dev, "canceled notification %x !\n", msg); } - /* no break, continue ! */ + /* fall through */ case MSG_TYPE_ANSWER: /* answer or notification to a message we are waiting for*/ mutex_lock(&mgr->msg_lock);