[alsa-devel] ALSA package release v1.0.26 (user space)
Hello all,
I would like to notify you, that ALSA packages version 1.0.26 are available for download:
ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/lib/alsa-lib-1.0.26.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-1.0.26.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/tools/alsa-tools-1.0.26.1.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/plugins/alsa-plugins-1.0.26.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/pyalsa/pyalsa-1.0.26.tar.bz2
The alsa-firmware and alsa-oss packages have no changes and they were not released this time.
The changelog is available at this URL:
http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Changes_v1.0.25_v1.0.26
The alsa-driver package will be released in next weeks once the driver repository with the build code and the mirrored kernel code will be reorganized to be more "GIT pull" friendly for those using the whole kernel tree as the development platform.
Jaroslav
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/12 13:19, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
I would like to notify you, that ALSA packages version 1.0.26 are available for download
Thanks Jaroslav, that's in Gentoo now. I was unable to bump alsa-utils & alsa-headers up without the alsa-driver 1.0.26, but everything else is there now.
Regards, - -- Tony Vroon Server systems manager London Internet Exchange Ltd, Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough, PE1 1DA Registered in England number 3137929 E-Mail: tony@linx.net
At Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:11:37 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
On 07/09/12 13:19, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
I would like to notify you, that ALSA packages version 1.0.26 are available for download
Thanks Jaroslav, that's in Gentoo now. I was unable to bump alsa-utils & alsa-headers up without the alsa-driver 1.0.26, but everything else is there now.
What is the reason alsa-utils and headers can't be built without alsa-driver update? The build of alsa-utils has nothing to do with alsa-driver in general...
I'm not sure about alsa-headers, though. Isn't it a package containing header files from alsa-lib? alsa-lib should contain all necessary header files, even the ones for sound drivers.
Takashi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/12 14:22, Takashi Iwai wrote:
I'm not sure about alsa-headers, though. Isn't it a package containing header files from alsa-lib?
We generate only our headers from alsa-driver, and don't use the actual drivers in there (favouring the kernel for that). If you're saying that the same headers can be stolen from the alsa-lib tarball instead that would be delightful. I shall have a proper look at this over the weekend or on Monday, and if I can come up with a good reason as to why that wouldn't work I'll share it with you.
In all honesty I inherited ebuild scripts that worked like this and haven't had the need to revise that until now.
Regards, - -- Tony Vroon Server systems manager London Internet Exchange Ltd, Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough, PE1 1DA Registered in England number 3137929 E-Mail: tony@linx.net
At Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:26:01 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
On 07/09/12 14:22, Takashi Iwai wrote:
I'm not sure about alsa-headers, though. Isn't it a package containing header files from alsa-lib?
We generate only our headers from alsa-driver, and don't use the actual drivers in there (favouring the kernel for that). If you're saying that the same headers can be stolen from the alsa-lib tarball instead that would be delightful.
Yes, in general, all necessary kernel headers like include/sound/asound.h should be included in alsa-lib, too.
Takashi
participants (3)
-
Jaroslav Kysela -
Takashi Iwai -
Tony Vroon