[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Allocate PCM operations dynamically to support multiple DAIs
From: Sangsu Park sangsu4u.park@samsung.com
The original code does not cover the case that two DAIs(CPU) have different ASoC core PCM operations(like mmap, pointer...). Currently we have only one global soc_pcm_ops for ASoC core PCM operation. When two DAIs have different pointer functions, second DAI's pointer function is set for both first DAI and second DAI in case of original code.
This patch allocates ASoC core PCM operations dynamically for each DAIs. So each DAIs can have different ASoC core PCM operations. This is needed to support multiple DAIs.
Signed-off-by: Sangsu Park sangsu4u.park@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim sbkim73@samsung.com --- sound/core/pcm.c | 1 + sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c index 8928ca8..15cf27a 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm.c @@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ static void snd_pcm_free_stream(struct snd_pcm_str * pstr) substream_next = substream->next; snd_pcm_timer_done(substream); snd_pcm_substream_proc_done(substream); + kfree(substream->ops); kfree(substream); substream = substream_next; } diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 8aa7cec..3a52534 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -598,17 +598,6 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t soc_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) return offset; }
-/* ASoC PCM operations */ -static struct snd_pcm_ops soc_pcm_ops = { - .open = soc_pcm_open, - .close = soc_pcm_close, - .hw_params = soc_pcm_hw_params, - .hw_free = soc_pcm_hw_free, - .prepare = soc_pcm_prepare, - .trigger = soc_pcm_trigger, - .pointer = soc_pcm_pointer, -}; - /* create a new pcm */ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num) { @@ -616,10 +605,25 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num) struct snd_soc_platform *platform = rtd->platform; struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai = rtd->codec_dai; struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = rtd->cpu_dai; + struct snd_pcm_ops *soc_pcm_ops; struct snd_pcm *pcm; char new_name[64]; int ret = 0, playback = 0, capture = 0;
+ soc_pcm_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_pcm_ops), GFP_KERNEL); + if (soc_pcm_ops == NULL) { + snd_printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot allocate PCM OPS\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + soc_pcm_ops->open = soc_pcm_open; + soc_pcm_ops->close = soc_pcm_close; + soc_pcm_ops->hw_params = soc_pcm_hw_params; + soc_pcm_ops->hw_free = soc_pcm_hw_free; + soc_pcm_ops->prepare = soc_pcm_prepare; + soc_pcm_ops->trigger = soc_pcm_trigger; + soc_pcm_ops->pointer = soc_pcm_pointer; + /* check client and interface hw capabilities */ snprintf(new_name, sizeof(new_name), "%s %s-%d", rtd->dai_link->stream_name, codec_dai->name, num); @@ -643,20 +647,20 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num) rtd->pcm = pcm; pcm->private_data = rtd; if (platform->driver->ops) { - soc_pcm_ops.mmap = platform->driver->ops->mmap; - soc_pcm_ops.pointer = platform->driver->ops->pointer; - soc_pcm_ops.ioctl = platform->driver->ops->ioctl; - soc_pcm_ops.copy = platform->driver->ops->copy; - soc_pcm_ops.silence = platform->driver->ops->silence; - soc_pcm_ops.ack = platform->driver->ops->ack; - soc_pcm_ops.page = platform->driver->ops->page; + soc_pcm_ops->mmap = platform->driver->ops->mmap; + soc_pcm_ops->pointer = platform->driver->ops->pointer; + soc_pcm_ops->ioctl = platform->driver->ops->ioctl; + soc_pcm_ops->copy = platform->driver->ops->copy; + soc_pcm_ops->silence = platform->driver->ops->silence; + soc_pcm_ops->ack = platform->driver->ops->ack; + soc_pcm_ops->page = platform->driver->ops->page; }
if (playback) - snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK, &soc_pcm_ops); + snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK, soc_pcm_ops);
if (capture) - snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE, &soc_pcm_ops); + snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE, soc_pcm_ops);
if (platform->driver->pcm_new) { ret = platform->driver->pcm_new(rtd);
On 12/23/2011 01:26 AM, Sangbeom Kim wrote:
From: Sangsu Park sangsu4u.park@samsung.com
The original code does not cover the case that two DAIs(CPU) have different ASoC core PCM operations(like mmap, pointer...). Currently we have only one global soc_pcm_ops for ASoC core PCM operation. When two DAIs have different pointer functions, second DAI's pointer function is set for both first DAI and second DAI in case of original code.
This patch allocates ASoC core PCM operations dynamically for each DAIs. So each DAIs can have different ASoC core PCM operations. This is needed to support multiple DAIs.
Signed-off-by: Sangsu Park sangsu4u.park@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim sbkim73@samsung.com
sound/core/pcm.c | 1 + sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c index 8928ca8..15cf27a 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm.c @@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ static void snd_pcm_free_stream(struct snd_pcm_str * pstr) substream_next = substream->next; snd_pcm_timer_done(substream); snd_pcm_substream_proc_done(substream);
kfree(substream->ops);
This looks wrong. It will probably cause regression for all non ASoC sound card drivers.
The issue this patch addresses came up before and I think the conclusion was that it is best to embed the snd_pcm_ops struct into the snd_soc_pcm_runtime struct.
participants (2)
-
Lars-Peter Clausen
-
Sangbeom Kim