Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] sound/sgtl5000: fix codec register initial values and mask
On 06/11/2013 12:22 PM, Oskar Schirmer wrote:
According to documentation bit 3:2 in register SSS_CTRL are reserved and zero, so initially setting the register to 0x0008 does not make much sense. Instead, bit 4 should be marked set, as this is the power up default.
Further, mask computation in declarative part is obviously wrong: Fix FRAC DIVISOR to provide an 11 bit mask correctly.
Signed-off-by: Oskar Schirmer oskar@scara.com Tested-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Looks good, but please copy Mark Brown. Just added him in Cc now.
sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c | 2 +- sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c index d441559..10092ba 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static const struct reg_default sgtl5000_reg_defaults[] = { { SGTL5000_CHIP_CLK_CTRL, 0x0008 }, { SGTL5000_CHIP_I2S_CTRL, 0x0010 },
- { SGTL5000_CHIP_SSS_CTRL, 0x0008 },
- { SGTL5000_CHIP_SSS_CTRL, 0x0010 }, { SGTL5000_CHIP_DAC_VOL, 0x3c3c }, { SGTL5000_CHIP_PAD_STRENGTH, 0x015f }, { SGTL5000_CHIP_ANA_HP_CTRL, 0x1818 },
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.h b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.h index 4b69229..52bd843 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.h +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sgtl5000.h @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ #define SGTL5000_PLL_INT_DIV_MASK 0xf800 #define SGTL5000_PLL_INT_DIV_SHIFT 11 #define SGTL5000_PLL_INT_DIV_WIDTH 5 -#define SGTL5000_PLL_FRAC_DIV_MASK 0x0700 +#define SGTL5000_PLL_FRAC_DIV_MASK 0x07ff #define SGTL5000_PLL_FRAC_DIV_SHIFT 0 #define SGTL5000_PLL_FRAC_DIV_WIDTH 11
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 01:01:57PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On 06/11/2013 12:22 PM, Oskar Schirmer wrote:
According to documentation bit 3:2 in register SSS_CTRL are reserved and zero, so initially setting the register to 0x0008 does not make much sense. Instead, bit 4 should be marked set, as this is the power up default.
Further, mask computation in declarative part is obviously wrong: Fix FRAC DIVISOR to provide an 11 bit mask correctly.
Signed-off-by: Oskar Schirmer oskar@scara.com Tested-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
Looks good, but please copy Mark Brown. Just added him in Cc now.
Please also use subject lines matching the normal style for the subsystem. I can't apply this unless someone sends me a copy properly (not quoted and so on).
participants (2)
-
Fabio Estevam
-
Mark Brown