[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Added 10ms delay after amp software reset
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com --- Changes : Applied 10ms delay after amp software reset. 10ms guard time is required for stability. sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c index 2764fae..6aaff03 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c @@ -730,6 +730,7 @@ static int max98373_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) /* Software Reset */ regmap_write(max98373->regmap, MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET, MAX98373_SOFT_RESET); + mdelay(10);
/* IV default slot configuration */ regmap_write(max98373->regmap, @@ -818,6 +819,7 @@ static int max98373_resume(struct device *dev)
regmap_write(max98373->regmap, MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET, MAX98373_SOFT_RESET); + mdelay(10); regcache_cache_only(max98373->regmap, false); regcache_sync(max98373->regmap); return 0;
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:21 PM Ryan Lee ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com
Changes : Applied 10ms delay after amp software reset. 10ms guard time is required for stability. sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c index 2764fae..6aaff03 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98373.c @@ -730,6 +730,7 @@ static int max98373_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) /* Software Reset */ regmap_write(max98373->regmap, MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET, MAX98373_SOFT_RESET);
mdelay(10);
Is it really necessary for the CPU to spin for 10msec here? usleep_range() would be better solution.
/* IV default slot configuration */ regmap_write(max98373->regmap,@@ -818,6 +819,7 @@ static int max98373_resume(struct device *dev)
regmap_write(max98373->regmap, MAX98373_R2000_SW_RESET, MAX98373_SOFT_RESET);
mdelay(10); regcache_cache_only(max98373->regmap, false); regcache_sync(max98373->regmap); return 0;-- 2.7.4
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:31:04PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:21 PM Ryan Lee ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com wrote:
mdelay(10);
Is it really necessary for the CPU to spin for 10msec here? usleep_range() would be better solution.
Or msleep() for that matter, it's not going ot be the end of the world if we delay a bit too long.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:31:04PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:21 PM Ryan Lee ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com wrote:
mdelay(10);Is it really necessary for the CPU to spin for 10msec here? usleep_range() would be better solution.
Or msleep() for that matter, it's not going ot be the end of the world if we delay a bit too long.
Frankly, I'd rather we did not introduce extra delays. I do not know if we use this part, but on ChromeOS we are interested in shaving as much from the boot time as possible and 10 msecs here and 10 msecs there do add up.
Thanks.
-----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 5:08 PM To: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Cc: Ryan Lee RyanS.Lee@maximintegrated.com; Liam Girdwood lgirdwood@gmail.com; Jaroslav Kysela perex@perex.cz; Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.com; Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; lkml linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ryan.lee.maxim@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Added 10ms delay after amp software reset
EXTERNAL EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:31:04PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:21 PM Ryan Lee
ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com wrote:
mdelay(10);Is it really necessary for the CPU to spin for 10msec here? usleep_range() would be better solution.
Or msleep() for that matter, it's not going ot be the end of the world if we delay a bit too long.
Frankly, I'd rather we did not introduce extra delays. I do not know if we use this part, but on ChromeOS we are interested in shaving as much from the boot time as possible and 10 msecs here and 10 msecs there do add up.
Thanks for all your feedback. Let me apply usleep_range() or msleep() instead of using mdelay().
Thanks.
-- Dmitry
participants (3)
-
Dmitry Torokhov -
Mark Brown -
Ryan Lee