[alsa-devel] [PATCH v14 7/7] ASoC: amd MMAP_INTERLEAVED Support
ACP-I2S device support MMAP_INTERLEAVED. Added support for the same.
Signed-off-by: Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@amd.com --- sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c index 916f0d8..28a3081 100644 --- a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static const struct snd_pcm_hardware acp3x_pcm_hardware_playback = { .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH | + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME, .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | @@ -42,7 +43,8 @@ static const struct snd_pcm_hardware acp3x_pcm_hardware_capture = { .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH | - SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME, + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID | + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME, .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE,
Hi Mark,
Patches have been reviewed by Dan and pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Please can you upstream these please.
Regards, Vishnu
On 05/12/19 7:07 PM, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:
ACP-I2S device support MMAP_INTERLEAVED. Added support for the same.
Signed-off-by: Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@amd.com
sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c index 916f0d8..28a3081 100644 --- a/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c +++ b/sound/soc/amd/raven/acp3x-pcm-dma.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static const struct snd_pcm_hardware acp3x_pcm_hardware_playback = { .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH |
SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID |@@ -42,7 +43,8 @@ static const struct snd_pcm_hardware acp3x_pcm_hardware_capture = { .info = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH |
SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME,
SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID |SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:59:56AM +0530, vishnu wrote:
Hi Mark,
Patches have been reviewed by Dan and pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
I see no reviewed-by tags on most of this.
Please can you upstream these please.
No, I will review them first. Given the problems that have been seen on previous reviews I don't intend to rush that.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
participants (3)
-
Mark Brown -
Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao -
vishnu