[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: HDA: Fix several mismatch for register mask and value
E.g. for snd_hdac_ext_link_clear_stream_id(), we should set (1 << stream) as mask, and 0 as value, here correct it and several similar mismatches.
And, here also remove unreadable register_mask usage for those mask value updating.
Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie yang.jie@linux.intel.com --- sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_stream.c | 22 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_stream.c b/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_stream.c index 1bd27576db98..a835558ddbc9 100644 --- a/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_stream.c +++ b/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_stream.c @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_ext_stream_decouple); */ void snd_hdac_ext_link_stream_start(struct hdac_ext_stream *stream) { - snd_hdac_updatel(stream->pplc_addr, AZX_REG_PPLCCTL, 0, AZX_PPLCCTL_RUN); + snd_hdac_updatel(stream->pplc_addr, AZX_REG_PPLCCTL, + AZX_PPLCCTL_RUN, AZX_PPLCCTL_RUN); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_ext_link_stream_start);
@@ -171,7 +172,8 @@ void snd_hdac_ext_link_stream_reset(struct hdac_ext_stream *stream)
snd_hdac_ext_link_stream_clear(stream);
- snd_hdac_updatel(stream->pplc_addr, AZX_REG_PPLCCTL, 0, AZX_PPLCCTL_STRST); + snd_hdac_updatel(stream->pplc_addr, AZX_REG_PPLCCTL, + AZX_PPLCCTL_STRST, AZX_PPLCCTL_STRST); udelay(3); timeout = 50; do { @@ -242,7 +244,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_ext_link_set_stream_id); void snd_hdac_ext_link_clear_stream_id(struct hdac_ext_link *link, int stream) { - snd_hdac_updatew(link->ml_addr, AZX_REG_ML_LOSIDV, 0, (1 << stream)); + snd_hdac_updatew(link->ml_addr, AZX_REG_ML_LOSIDV, (1 << stream), 0); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_ext_link_clear_stream_id);
@@ -415,7 +417,6 @@ void snd_hdac_ext_stream_spbcap_enable(struct hdac_bus *bus, bool enable, int index) { u32 mask = 0; - u32 register_mask = 0;
if (!bus->spbcap) { dev_err(bus->dev, "Address of SPB capability is NULL\n"); @@ -424,12 +425,8 @@ void snd_hdac_ext_stream_spbcap_enable(struct hdac_bus *bus,
mask |= (1 << index);
- register_mask = readl(bus->spbcap + AZX_REG_SPB_SPBFCCTL); - - mask |= register_mask; - if (enable) - snd_hdac_updatel(bus->spbcap, AZX_REG_SPB_SPBFCCTL, 0, mask); + snd_hdac_updatel(bus->spbcap, AZX_REG_SPB_SPBFCCTL, mask, mask); else snd_hdac_updatel(bus->spbcap, AZX_REG_SPB_SPBFCCTL, mask, 0); } @@ -503,7 +500,6 @@ void snd_hdac_ext_stream_drsm_enable(struct hdac_bus *bus, bool enable, int index) { u32 mask = 0; - u32 register_mask = 0;
if (!bus->drsmcap) { dev_err(bus->dev, "Address of DRSM capability is NULL\n"); @@ -512,12 +508,8 @@ void snd_hdac_ext_stream_drsm_enable(struct hdac_bus *bus,
mask |= (1 << index);
- register_mask = readl(bus->drsmcap + AZX_REG_SPB_SPBFCCTL); - - mask |= register_mask; - if (enable) - snd_hdac_updatel(bus->drsmcap, AZX_REG_DRSM_CTL, 0, mask); + snd_hdac_updatel(bus->drsmcap, AZX_REG_DRSM_CTL, mask, mask); else snd_hdac_updatel(bus->drsmcap, AZX_REG_DRSM_CTL, mask, 0); }
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 04:47:09 +0200, Keyon Jie wrote:
E.g. for snd_hdac_ext_link_clear_stream_id(), we should set (1 << stream) as mask, and 0 as value, here correct it and several similar mismatches.
And, here also remove unreadable register_mask usage for those mask value updating.
Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie yang.jie@linux.intel.com
Thanks, applied now.
Looking at this nice fix, it worries me a bit about the quality of the code there... We may need to audit the whole code again. Oh well.
Takashi
participants (2)
-
Keyon Jie
-
Takashi Iwai