[alsa-devel] [PATCH] Fix an OOB bug in uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
`uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`.
Reported-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com Reported-by: Mathias Payer mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net Signed-off-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com --- sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) { - int mu_channels; + int mu_channels = 0; void *c;
- if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) - return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) - return -EINVAL;
switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 4) + return 0; + + mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); + break; + case UAC_VERSION_2: - default: - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 6) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ + mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3: + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 2) + return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ + mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break; + + default: + break; }
if (!mu_channels)
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
`uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`.
Reported-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com Reported-by: Mathias Payer mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net Signed-off-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com
Ah a good catch.
One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g.
/* calculate the offset of bmControls field */ size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL, protocol) - NULL; .... if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset) return 0;
thanks,
Takashi
sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) {
- int mu_channels;
- int mu_channels = 0; void *c;
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))
return -EINVAL;if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL;
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
return -EINVAL;switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1:
// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 4)return 0;mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);break;- case UAC_VERSION_2:
- default:
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1)
// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 6) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3:
// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 2)return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break;
default:
break;}
if (!mu_channels)
-- 2.22.1
Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it is accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1. Is this intended?
static inline __u8 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/__u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct uac_processing_unit_descriptor https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc, int protocol https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/protocol){ switch (protocol https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/UAC_VERSION_1: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5]; case UAC_VERSION_2 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/UAC_VERSION_2: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6]; case UAC_VERSION_3 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/ident/UAC_VERSION_3: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2]; default: return NULL; }}
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
`uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`.
Reported-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com Reported-by: Mathias Payer mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net Signed-off-by: Hui Peng benquike@gmail.com
Ah a good catch.
One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g.
/* calculate the offset of bmControls field */ size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL, protocol) -NULL; .... if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset) return 0;
thanks,
Takashi
sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct
mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust
static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor
*desc)
{
int mu_channels;
int mu_channels = 0; void *c;
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL;if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)return -EINVAL; switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1:
// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 4)return 0;mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);break;case UAC_VERSION_2:
default:if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1)
// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 6) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3:// limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControlsif (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 2)return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break;default:break; } if (!mu_channels)-- 2.22.1
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:57:38 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it is accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1. Is this intended?
Yes, this isn't for the mixer unit but for the processing unit. They have different definitions.
Now back to the original report: I read the code again but fail to see where is OOB access. Let's see the function:
static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) { int mu_channels; void *c;
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL;
switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: case UAC_VERSION_2: default: if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3: mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break; }
if (!mu_channels) return 0;
... until this point, mu_channels is calculated but no actual access happens. Then:
c = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(desc, state->mixer->protocol);
... this returns the *address* of the bmControls bitmap. At this point, it's not accessed yet. Now:
if (c - (void *)desc + (mu_channels - 1) / 8 >= desc->bLength) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
... here we check whether the actual bitmap address plus the max bitmap size overflows bLength. And if it overflows, returns 0, indicating no bitmap available.
So the code doesn't access but checks properly beforehand as far as I understand. Is the actual OOB access triggered by some program?
thanks,
Takashi
static inline __u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc, int protocol) { switch (protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5]; case UAC_VERSION_2: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6]; case UAC_VERSION_3: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2]; default: return NULL; } }
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200, Hui Peng wrote: > > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` > to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of > uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access > in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`. > > Reported-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net> > Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> Ah a good catch. One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g. /* calculate the offset of bmControls field */ size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL, protocol) - NULL; .... if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset) return 0; thanks, Takashi > --- > sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c > index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 > --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c > @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust > static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, > struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) > { > - int mu_channels; > + int mu_channels = 0; > void *c; > > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) > - return -EINVAL; > if (!desc->bNrInPins) > return -EINVAL; > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) > - return -EINVAL; > > switch (state->mixer->protocol) { > case UAC_VERSION_1: > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 4) > + return 0; > + > + mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > + break; > + > case UAC_VERSION_2: > - default: > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 6) > return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > + > mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > break; > case UAC_VERSION_3: > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 2) > + return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > + > mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, > uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); > break; > + > + default: > + break; > } > > if (!mu_channels) > -- > 2.22.1 > >
No, there was not triggering. I found it accidentally when I was going through the code.
Yeah, you are right. it is handled in the last check. Is it defined in the spec that the descriptor needs to have 4/6/2 additional bytes for the bmControl field?, if so, it is easier to understand the using the code in the way in my first patch.
If you think this is unnecessary, we can skip this patch.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:18 PM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:57:38 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it
is
accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1. Is this intended?
Yes, this isn't for the mixer unit but for the processing unit. They have different definitions.
Now back to the original report: I read the code again but fail to see where is OOB access. Let's see the function:
static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) { int mu_channels; void *c;
if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: case UAC_VERSION_2: default: if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3: mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break; } if (!mu_channels) return 0;... until this point, mu_channels is calculated but no actual access happens. Then:
c = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(desc, state->mixer->protocol);... this returns the *address* of the bmControls bitmap. At this point, it's not accessed yet. Now:
if (c - (void *)desc + (mu_channels - 1) / 8 >= desc->bLength) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */... here we check whether the actual bitmap address plus the max bitmap size overflows bLength. And if it overflows, returns 0, indicating no bitmap available.
So the code doesn't access but checks properly beforehand as far as I understand. Is the actual OOB access triggered by some program?
thanks,
Takashi
static inline __u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct
uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc,
int protocol){ switch (protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5]; case UAC_VERSION_2: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6]; case UAC_VERSION_3: return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2]; default: return NULL; } }
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200, Hui Peng wrote: > > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` > to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of > uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access > in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`. > > Reported-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net> > Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> Ah a good catch. One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g. /* calculate the offset of bmControls field */ size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL,protocol) -
NULL; .... if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset) return 0; thanks, Takashi > --- > sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c > index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 > --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c > @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust > static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, > structuac_mixer_unit_descriptor
*desc) > { > - int mu_channels; > + int mu_channels = 0; > void *c; > > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) > - return -EINVAL; > if (!desc->bNrInPins) > return -EINVAL; > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) > - return -EINVAL; > > switch (state->mixer->protocol) { > case UAC_VERSION_1: > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
> + return 0; > + > + mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > + break; > + > case UAC_VERSION_2: > - default: > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
> + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
> return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > + > mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > break; > case UAC_VERSION_3: > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
> + return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > + > mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, >uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc));
> break; > + > + default: > + break; > } > > if (!mu_channels) > -- > 2.22.1 > >
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:47:05 +0200, Hui Peng wrote:
No, there was not triggering. I found it accidentally when I was going through the code.
Yeah, you are right. it is handled in the last check. Is it defined in the spec that the descriptor needs to have 4/6/2 additional bytes for the bmControl field?, if so, it is easier to understand the using the code in the way in my first patch.
If you think this is unnecessary, we can skip this patch.
Well, the patch essentially open-codes what the helper function does adds one more check unnecessarily, so I don't think it worth. Let's skip it.
thanks,
Takashi
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:18 PM Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:57:38 +0200, Hui Peng wrote: > > Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following > function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it is > accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1. > Is this intended? Yes, this isn't for the mixer unit but for the processing unit. They have different definitions. Now back to the original report: I read the code again but fail to see where is OOB access. Let's see the function: static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor *desc) { int mu_channels; void *c; if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) return -EINVAL; if (!desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) return -EINVAL; switch (state->mixer->protocol) { case UAC_VERSION_1: case UAC_VERSION_2: default: if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); break; case UAC_VERSION_3: mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc)); break; } if (!mu_channels) return 0; ... until this point, mu_channels is calculated but no actual access happens. Then: c = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(desc, state->mixer->protocol); ... this returns the *address* of the bmControls bitmap. At this point, it's not accessed yet. Now: if (c - (void *)desc + (mu_channels - 1) / 8 >= desc->bLength) return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ ... here we check whether the actual bitmap address plus the max bitmap size overflows bLength. And if it overflows, returns 0, indicating no bitmap available. So the code doesn't access but checks properly beforehand as far as I understand. Is the actual OOB access triggered by some program? thanks, Takashi > > static inline __u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc, > int protocol) > { > switch (protocol) { > case UAC_VERSION_1: > return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5]; > case UAC_VERSION_2: > return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6]; > case UAC_VERSION_3: > return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2]; > default: > return NULL; > } > } > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200, > Hui Peng wrote: > > > > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls` > > to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of > > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of > > uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access > > in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`. > > > > Reported-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net> > > Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com> > > Ah a good catch. > > One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from > uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g. > > /* calculate the offset of bmControls field */ > size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL, protocol) - > NULL; > .... > if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset) > return 0; > > thanks, > > Takashi > > > --- > > sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c > > index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644 > > --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c > > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c > > @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct > mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust > > static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state, > > struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor > *desc) > > { > > - int mu_channels; > > + int mu_channels = 0; > > void *c; > > > > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc)) > > - return -EINVAL; > > if (!desc->bNrInPins) > > return -EINVAL; > > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins) > > - return -EINVAL; > > > > switch (state->mixer->protocol) { > > case UAC_VERSION_1: > > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 4) > > + return 0; > > + > > + mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > > + break; > > + > > case UAC_VERSION_2: > > - default: > > - if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1) > > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 6) > > return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > > + > > mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc); > > break; > > case UAC_VERSION_3: > > + // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls > > + if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 2) > > + return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */ > > + > > mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state, > > uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID (desc)); > > break; > > + > > + default: > > + break; > > } > > > > if (!mu_channels) > > -- > > 2.22.1 > > > > > >
participants (2)
-
Hui Peng -
Takashi Iwai