Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Add driver for rt5631
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 06:32:42PM +0800, johnnyhsu@realtek.com wrote:
switch (reg) {
- case RT5631_VENDOR_ID:
- case RT5631_VENDOR_ID1:
- case RT5631_VENDOR_ID2:
return 0;
- default:
- case RT5631_RESET:
- case RT5631_INT_ST_IRQ_CTRL_2:
- case RT5631_INDEX_ADD:
- case RT5631_INDEX_DATA:
- case RT5631_EQ_CTRL: return 1;
- default:
return 0;
This is an incremental patch against your previous driver, not a full patch. You should always send a patches which can be applied against current kernels.
- pr_info("enter %s, syclk=%d\n", __func__, freq);
- dev_info(codec->dev, "enter %s, syclk=%d\n", __func__, freq);
This should be a debug level print at most, otherwise you just spam the console.
if (!freq_in || !freq_out) { dev_dbg(codec->dev, "PLL disabled\n");
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
I'd expect to see some sort of register write when the PLL is disabled?
/**
- rt5631_index_reg_show - sysfs file for dumping index registers of 2nd layer
- rt5631_index_reg_show: Show private register of rt5631 codec.
- @dev: device to query.
- @attr: device attribute.
- @buf: buffer to display.
- To show private registers which are not changed often by user.
*/
- You have to access them through register 0x6a and 0x6c.
static ssize_t rt5631_index_reg_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
As I've told you repeatedly you should be using the standard facilities for debug access to registers - you should not open coding this in your driver. Once again, ignoring review comments isn't helpful.
participants (1)
-
Mark Brown